Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc., 337 N.W.2d 676.

63 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Michael Robert Jacobson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co. v. Westin, Inc., d 676, 679 (Minn. 1983)).
Husky Construction, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co. v. Westin, Inc., -80 (Minn. 1983)).
Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC 884 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2016
Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC 884 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2016
Co. v. Westin, Inc., -79 (Minn. 1983).
Newman-Lakka Cancer Foundation v. Christine E. Briggs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Newman-Lakka Cancer Foundation v. Christine E. Briggs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Griffis v. Luban 646 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2002
Griffis v. Luban 646 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2002
KSTP-FM, LLC v. Specialized Communications, Inc. 602 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
KSTP-FM, LLC v. Specialized Communications, Inc. 602 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Welsh v. Takekawa Iron Works Co., Ltd. 529 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Welsh v. Takekawa Iron Works Co., Ltd. 529 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Co. v. Westin, Inc., , 681 n. 4 (Minn.1983) (appellate court had to take record as it was, even though investigation might have uncovered sufficient facts to establish jurisdiction).
Hoeller v. Riverside Resort Hotel 820 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Marriage of Impola v. Impola 464 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Impola v. Impola 464 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Larson v. Dunn 460 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1990
Larson v. Dunn 460 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1990
S.B. Schmidt Paper Co. v. a to Z Paper Co. 452 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
S.B. Schmidt Paper Co. v. a to Z Paper Co. 452 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
This interest, however, has been “de-emphasized” in an attempt to slow the “inexorable expansion of jurisdiction in state courts.” West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc.
Larson v. Dunn 449 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Larson v. Dunn 449 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc.
Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The critical focus in any jurisdictional analysis is “the relationship among the defendant, the forum and the litigation.” West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc., (quoting Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320, 327 , 100 S.Ct.
Marriage of Mahoney v. Mahoney 433 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Mahoney v. Mahoney 433 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc.
Johnson v. Sel-Mor Distributing Co., Inc. 430 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Sel-Mor Distributing Co., Inc. 430 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The critical focus in any jurisdictional analysis is “the relationship among the defendant, the forum and the litigation.” West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc., (quoting Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320, 327 , 100 S.Ct.
Real Properties, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1988
Real Properties, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co. 427 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 1988
Co. v. Western, Inc., (emphasis in original).
Sherburne County Social Sevices Ex Rel. Pouliot v. Kennedy 426 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1988
Sherburne County Social Sevices Ex Rel. Pouliot v. Kennedy 426 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1988
The critical focus in any jurisdictional analysis is “the relationship among the defendant, the forum and the litigation.” West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc., (quoting Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320, 327 , 100 S.Ct.
Brown County Family Service Center v. Miner 419 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Brown County Family Service Center v. Miner 419 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The court, in reviewing the nature and quality of the contacts, must determine whether “defendant’s conduct and connection with the forum State are such that he should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there.” West Americun Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc., (quoting World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 297 , 100 S.Ct.
Lawson v. Darrington 416 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lawson v. Darrington 416 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the supreme court declined to exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident liquor vendor where only one hearsay allegation constituted the contact and no solicitation contacts were alleged.
Walker and Co., Ltd. v. Lawrence 416 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Walker and Co., Ltd. v. Lawrence 416 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc.
SHERBURNE CTY. SOC. SERV. v. Kennedy 409 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
SHERBURNE CTY. SOC. SERV. v. Kennedy 409 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
D. Interest of Minnesota in providing a forum In West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc., the Minnesota Supreme Court noted the United States Supreme Court's shift of the focus of this element in two recent cases, World-Wide Volkswagen, 444 U.S. 286 , 100 S.Ct.
Sherburne County Social Services ex rel. Pouliot v. Kennedy 409 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sherburne County Social Services ex rel. Pouliot v. Kennedy 409 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
D. Interest of Minnesota in providing a forum In West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc., the Minnesota Supreme Court noted the United States Supreme Court’s shift of the focus of this element in two recent cases, World-Wide Volkswagen, 444 U.S. 286 , 100 S.Ct.
Leach v. Curtis of Iowa, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Leach v. Curtis of Iowa, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In evaluating the quantity of contacts Curtis had with Minnesota, “the critical focus in * * * [the] jurisdictional analysis must be on the relationship among the defendant, the forum and the litigation.” West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc., (quoting Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320, 327 , 100 S.Ct.
Stangel v. Rucker 398 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Stangel v. Rucker 398 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc.
Now Foods Corp. v. Madison Equipment Co. 386 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Now Foods Corp. v. Madison Equipment Co. 386 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The last two factors, interest of the state in providing a forum and convenience of the parties, have recently been “de-emphasized” in an attempt to slow the “inexorable expansion of jurisdiction in state courts.” West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc.
Hanson v. JOHN BLUE CO., DIV. OF BURNLEY CORP. 389 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hanson v. JOHN BLUE CO., DIV. OF BURNLEY CORP. 389 N.W.2d 523 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc., -79 (Minn.1983) (citations omitted).
State v. Hartling 360 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1985