Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Mitterhauser v. Mitterhauser, 399 N.W.2d 664.

37 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 664, 667 (Minn. App. 1987) (stating appellant has the burden to provide an adequate record on appeal and affirming findings regarding the parties’ assets when appellant did not order transcript).
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
17, 2019); (applying Collins in a family-law appeal).
In re the Estate of Gordon Jaenisch, Deceased, and In re the Estate of MaryAnn Shirley Jaenisch, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. U -Haul Co. of Minnesota
In re the Marriage of: Jeannine Colleen Scott Salchow, n/k/a Jeannine Colleen Farnsworth, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
But an appellate court “cannot base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal.” -83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 664, 667 (Minn. App. 1987).
Michael Nassif, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
North Mill Equipment Finance, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
An appellate court “cannot base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal and any matters not part of the record.”
In re the Marriage of: Camilla Renae Lee, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
David Anderson, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district “court’s me thod of valuation [of a restaurant] must be affirmed if it has an acceptable basis in fact and principle.” Mitterhauser v. Mitterhauser
State v. Breaux 620 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Breaux 620 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
A reviewing court “cannot base its decision on matters outside the record’ on appeal and any matters not part of the record must be stricken.”
Fosselman v. Commissioner of Human Services 612 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Fosselman v. Commissioner of Human Services 612 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(reviewing court must strike matters outside record).
Minnesota Central Railroad v. MCI Telecommunications Corp. 595 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Minnesota Central Railroad v. MCI Telecommunications Corp. 595 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
A reviewing court “cannot base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal and any matters not part of the record must be stricken.”
In Re the Fairview-University Medical Center 590 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Fairview-University Medical Center 590 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Losoya v. Richardson 584 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Losoya v. Richardson 584 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
P. 110.01 (defining record on appeal as documents filed in district court along with exhibits and transcript); (stating “any matters not part of the record must be stricken”).
Hughs on Behalf of Praul v. Cole 572 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hughs on Behalf of Praul v. Cole 572 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
P. 110.01 (record on appeal consists of papers filed in district court); ("[a]n appellate court cannot base its decision on matters outside the record.”).
Taylor v. Lieffort 568 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Taylor v. Lieffort 568 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Ciardelli v. Rindal 565 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Ciardelli v. Rindal 565 N.W.2d 465 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Miller Waste Mills, Inc. v. MacKay 520 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Miller Waste Mills, Inc. v. MacKay 520 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(this court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal), pet for rev. denied (Minn. June 30, 1987).
State v. Morrow 492 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Morrow 492 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
“An appellate court cannot base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal and any matters not part of the record must be stricken.”
In Re the Demotion of Dillenberger 486 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Demotion of Dillenberger 486 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Manderfeld 482 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Manderfeld 482 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Hedburg v. Hedburg 412 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hedburg v. Hedburg 412 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Mark Lee Productions, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Mark Lee Productions, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1987