Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite St. Aubin v. Burke, 434 N.W.2d 282.

29 citing documents.

In the Matter of: Holly Elizabeth Often, o/b/o Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Kevin Robert Miller, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Aubin v. Burke , review denied (Minn. Mar.
Carol Vanerka Stephens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association v. National Football League, Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association v. National Football League, Regents of the University of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that this court’s function is “primarily decisional and error correcting rather than .
State of Minnesota v. T. J. Z. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. T. J. Z. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(directing that the court of appeals “is primarily decisional and error correcting rather than a legislative or doctrinal court.
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(noting that this court is required to follow established judicial precedent), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Adkins 706 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Adkins 706 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(stating, in context of rejecting adoption of discovery rule to trigger statute of limitations in medical-malpractice actions, “[i]t is not our role to abolish nearly 60 years of established judicial precedent”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Ripley v. Piehl 700 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ripley v. Piehl 700 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(refusing to adopt new rule of law, noting under Minnesota Court of Appeals Internal Rules this court will make new law “[o]nly when there are no statutory or judicial *548 precedents to follow”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Broek v. Park Nicollet Health Services 660 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Broek v. Park Nicollet Health Services 660 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(noting that only in absence of statutory or judicial precedents will court of appeals make new law), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Traylor 641 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Traylor 641 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams 631 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust of Williams 631 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Johnson v. Johnson 611 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Johnson v. Johnson 611 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Au- *826 (quoting this court’s Internal Rules: “[The court’s] primary function is the correction of error by application of legal principles.
Winona County Department of Human Services v. Casper 593 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Winona County Department of Human Services v. Casper 593 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(refusing to adopt new rule of law, noting under Minnesota Court of Appeals Internal Rules this court will make new law "[ojnly when there are no statutoiy or judicial precedents to follow”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Fabio v. Bellomo 489 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Fabio v. Bellomo 489 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Willette v. the Mayo Foundation 458 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Willette v. the Mayo Foundation 458 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(claim based on failure to diagnose cancer held barred as it was commenced more than two years after defendant doctor ceased treating plaintiff), pet.
Francis v. Hansing 449 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Francis v. Hansing 449 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1989

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by