Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Thornblad, 513 N.W.2d 260.

22 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Ryan also asserts that, by the time trial started, he had “missed his window” for making evidentiary and constitutional challenges; 5 however, if a defendant knowingly and intelligently waives the right to counsel, the defendant “must be allowed to represent himself despite his lack of the legal ability to conduct a good defense.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
If a defendant knowingly and intelligently waives the right to counsel, the defendant “must be allowed to represent himself despite his lack of the legal ability to conduct a good defense.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
If a defendant knowingly and intelligently waives the right to counsel, the 3 defendant “must be allowed to represent himself despite his lack of legal ability to conduct a good defense.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Godinez, 509 U.S. at 400, 113 S. Ct. at 2687; Camacho, d at 170; -63 (Minn. App. 1994).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
If a defendant knowingly and intelligently waives the right to counsel, the defe ndant “must be allowed to represent himself despite his lack of the legal ability to conduct a good defense.” State v. Thornblad
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
If a 6 defendant intelligently and knowingly waives the right to counsel, the defendant “must be allowed to represent himself despite his lack of the legal ability to conduct a good defense.” State v. Thornblad , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Scott Richard Seelye Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scott Richard Seelye Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 836, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541 (1975)).
State v. Pirsig 670 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Pirsig 670 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(implying defendant be present at sentencing); (implying defendant be present when entering a plea); (implying defendant be present when waiving right to an attorney).
In Re the Welfare of G.L.H. 604 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Welfare of G.L.H. 604 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In Re the Welfare of D.D.N. 582 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re the Welfare of D.D.N. 582 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See State v. Bauer, 310 Minn. 103, 117 , (employing “proper weight” standard in similar circumstance), rev’d in part on other grounds, -63 (Minn.App.
State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
State v. VanZee 547 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. VanZee 547 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 542 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of G. (NMN) M. 542 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
to support his contention that the trial court made an inadequate investigation to determine whether appellant’s confession was voluntary.
State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(citing Godinez v. Moran, ___ U.S. ____, ____ n. 12, 113 S.Ct.