Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Esler, 553 N.W.2d 61.

22 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Adin Gavriel Ceballos Mckillip Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(holding that damages were too attenuated from the crime because they “were separated by several hours and had different criminal objectives”), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Julio Armando Alvarado Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(reversing restitution award to homeowner and homeowner’s insurance company because the property damage caused by defendant was unrelated to the crime of 10 conviction), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Henry Albert Allison, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(holding restitution for fire damage improper when defendant was charged with robbery and arson but convicted only of robbery); (holding restitution improper 6 as to damage to home defendant used for “target practice” before the shooting murder of which he was convicted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Raymond Greenbush Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Jason Paul Hirman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Nelson, d at 347-48 (district court erred by considering losses that occurred outside the charging period); (district court erred in awarding restitution for losses stemming from murder, in which defendant took no part); State v. Esler , (district court erred in awarding restitution for shooting incident which took place several hours prior to the murder for wh ich defendant was convicted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Albert Schally Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Where the victim’s losses are directly caused by the defendant’s conduct for which he was convicted there is nothing improper in ordering restitution.” State v. Esler , (quotation omitted) , review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Colton Tyler Boettcher Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Angela Tharnaa Hooks Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(holding that a defendant who pleads guilty to being an accomplice after the fact to murder may only be required to pay restitution to the murder victim’s parents for the losses directly caused by her actions and may not be required to pay restitution for the losses resulting from the murder); (concluding that a court order directing payment of restitution to an individual who has been victimized by the actions of the defendant is improper when the injury to that 5 victim results from a separate
State v. Miller 842 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Miller 842 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Compare Latimer, d at 105 (holding restitution for losses directly attributable to victim’s murder improper against defendant who helped conceal murder afterwards but otherwise took no part in it), (holding restitution improper when awarded to homeowner for property damage caused by convicted murderer during “random ‘target practice’ ” earlier in day of murder), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In Re the Welfare of E.S.C. 731 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of E.S.C. 731 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Tze Thao 634 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Tze Thao 634 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Latimer 604 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Latimer 604 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn. Oct.
In Re the Welfare of J.A.D. 603 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Welfare of J.A.D. 603 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-64 (Minn.App.1996), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Colsch 579 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Colsch 579 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“Deciding whether a particular item of restitution fits within the statutory definition is a question of law and is fully reviewable by the appellate court.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Behl 573 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
For example, -77 (Minn.1983), review denied (Minn. Oct.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by