Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Paidar v. Hughes, 615 N.W.2d 276.

31 citing documents.

Frank R. Dropps, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Laymon v. Minn. Premier Props., LLC, (), aff’d
United Christian Fellowship Church, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
For support, respondents rely on a more recent case:
Mike Allen Homes, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Gregory T. Dyrdal v. James Wallenberg Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Robert Webber v. Rod Franks, Responsible Authority Carver County, Health and Human Services, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Gregory T. Dyrdal v. James Wallenberg Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-80 (Minn. 2000) (describing elements of slander 5 of title).
Robert Webber v. Rod Franks, Responsible Authority Carver County, Health and Human Services, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
5 question of law when “different minds can reasonably arrive only at one result.”
Craig Scherber & Associates, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
To plead a slander-of-title claim, a party must allege that (1) there was a false statement concerning the plaintiff’s real property, (2) the statement was published to others, (3) the publication was malicious, and (4) p ublication of the false statement caused the plaintiff “pecuniary loss in the form of special damages.” d 276, 279-80 (Minn. 2000).
A18-1375 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 276, 279-80 (Minn. 2000).
Depositors Ins. Co. v. Dollansky 919 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 2018
John Aydt, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
–80 (Minn. 2000); see also Kelly v. First State Bank of Rothsay, 145 Minn. 331, 332, 177 N.W.
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But a defendant is liable only for reasonable attorney fees and costs that were “necessarily incurred” by the plaintiff as a “direct result” of the defendant’s tortious conduct.
Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nicole Curtis v. Jason Jenny Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nicole Curtis v. Jason Jenny Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ronald Hagle v. The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of the Benefit of CWMBS Inc., Ryan … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ronald Hagle v. The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee of the Benefit of CWMBS Inc., Ryan … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus 801 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus 801 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
And causation is “generally a question of fact left to the finder of fact.”
Brickner v. ONE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 742 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Brickner v. ONE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 742 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Gagliardi v. Ortho-Midwest, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Gagliardi v. Ortho-Midwest, Inc. 733 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Although causation is generally a question of fact for the factfin-der, summary judgment is appropriate when a plaintiff cannot prove an essential element of her claim
Ingram v. Syverson 674 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Ingram v. Syverson 674 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See id.; (“Causation is generally a question of fact left to the finder of fact that only becomes a question of law “where different minds can reasonably arrive at only one result.’ ”); -83 (Minn.App.1991) (because negligence involves standards of reasonableness and caus
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 667 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2003
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 667 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2003