Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Witso v. Overby, 627 N.W.2d 63.

25 citing documents.

In Re: The Paternity of a Female child, born June 26, 2024. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“The [Minnesota Parentage Act (the act)] provides the exclusive bases for standing to bring an action to determine paternity.” -66 (Minn. 2001); see also Minn. Stat. §§ 257.51-.75 (2024).
William Christopher Edrington, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The statutory provisions under the MPA create “the exclusive bases for standing to bring an action to determine paternity.” Witso v. Overby , -66 (Minn. 2001).
In re the Matter of: M. V. K., d/o/b July 12, 2017, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Application of J.M.M. Minn. 2020
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
chitectural Grp., (concluding where the Legislature used both the terms "service” and "delivery” in a statutory scheme that "[b]e-cause service and delivery are consistently used synonymously in the context of personal service, there is no basis for us to conclude that the Legislature intended the two terms to be applied differently”); , 67 n. 7 (Minn.2001) (declining to interpret "declare” and "determine” differently in a statutory scheme where "[t]he difference in meaning” between the two term
Zentz v. Graber 760 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Zentz v. Graber 760 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“The right to bring a proceeding to establish paternity is totally a creature of the MPA.”
Beardsley v. Garcia 753 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 2008
Custody of the Child of Williams v. Carlson 701 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Custody of the Child of Williams v. Carlson 701 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(discussing affidavit required by section 257.62).
In Re Estate of Martignacco 689 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Estate of Martignacco 689 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust Created Under Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1974 674 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Trusteeship of the Trust Created Under Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1974 674 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
The Minnesota Parentage Act “provides the exclusive bases for standing to bring an action to determine paternity.” -66 (Minn.2001).
Dorman v. Steffen 666 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Dorman v. Steffen 666 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Appellant argues that the district court erred because (a) respondent-husband is the presumed father of the child; (b) cert.
In Re Estate of Palmer 658 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 2003
In Re Estate of Palmer 658 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 2003
In support of the proposition that the Parentage Act’s statute of limitations bars Smith’s probate claim, appellant cites Wit-so v. Overby, a paternity case where we stated, “The MPA [Parentage Act] provides the exclusive bases [sic] for standing to bring an action to determine paternity.” -66 (Minn.2001) ().
Frieson v. Pahkala 653 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Frieson v. Pahkala 653 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Estate of Palmer 647 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Estate of Palmer 647 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
' to argue that the Parentage Act is the exclusive means of establishing paternity.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by