Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Carlson v. Carlson, 390 N.W.2d 780.

26 citing documents.

Marlene Fearing, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(declining to reverse district court’s denial of removal motion absent clear abuse of discretion), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
LuAnn Carol Stanius, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Aug.
A20-0508 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Decisions to recuse are “within the [district] court’s discretion” and “should not be reversed absent clear abuse of that discretion.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: V. N. M. and C. W. N., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 780, 785 (Minn. App. 1986), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: David Michael Kedrowski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A judge who can preside fairly over the proceedings is not “required to step down upon allegations of a party which themselves may be unfair or which simply indicate dissatisfaction with the possible outcome of the litigation.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Scott Douglas Wiggins, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(noting that the fairness of a property division depends on many factors), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Ann Hughes, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. C. D. and H. L. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
at the district court judge abused her discretion by denying his motion to remove herself for cause, reasoning that the judge’s comments on the record and decision to deny father expanded parenting time demonstrated the judge’s bias.1 A district court’s decision to deny a recu sal motion is discretionary and “should not be reversed absent clear abuse of that discretion.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re: The Burial of Irina Kurdyumova (Deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re: The Burial of Irina Kurdyumova (Deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
John Patrick Murphy v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
John Patrick Murphy v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Marriage of Matson v. Matson 638 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Matson v. Matson 638 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(child support); (parenting time); , 151 (Minn.1989) (custody); (recusal motion), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Marriage of Lenz v. Lenz 409 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Lenz v. Lenz 409 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In valuing the inventory at $10,000, the trial court properly considered the depressed local resale market, pet.
Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken 396 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Haasken v. Haasken 396 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-86 (Minn.Ct.App.), pet.
Peterson v. Steinmaus 393 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Peterson v. Steinmaus 393 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“Review cannot be made when we are left only hindsight recollection of past conversations.”

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by