Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Production Credit Ass'n of Mankato v. Buckentin, 410 N.W.2d 820.

22 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A24-0831 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Northern Metals, LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Crow Wing Recycling, Inc.,... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Northern Metals, LLC v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Crow Wing Recycling, Inc.,... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Credit Ass’n -23 (Minn. 1987).
A22-1469 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Kristen Glaros Hanson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Minn. 2021
Credit Ass’n C ont’l Retail, LLC v. Cnty of Hennepin
Kristen Glaros Hanson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Credit Ass’n of Mankato v. Buckentin , (“While this court has never specifically enunci ated the review standard to be employed by appellate courts in reviewing dispositions of motions seeking attorney disqualification, we assume that 7 normally the ‘clearly erroneous ’ standard will be applied in reviewing strictly factual findings
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570 883 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 2016
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570 883 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 2016
State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co. 845 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2014
State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co. 845 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2014
-24 (Minn.1987) (relying on a different comment to Rule 1.9 in determining if matters were substantially related).
Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & Pines 768 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & Pines 768 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
This court applies a clearly erroneous standard of review to factual findings underlying an attorney disqualification, Production Credit Ass’n v. Buckentin, and we apply a de novo standard of review to the district court’s interpretations of rules of court, which present questions of law, Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Indep.
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 662 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 2003
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 662 N.W.2d 125 Minn. 2003
Credit Ass’n v. Buckentin
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District 11 638 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District 11 638 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Credit Ass’n v. Buckentin, (stating that to ensure uniform application, the reviewing court must retain the final, independent interpretive authority to define the scope and application of those rules).
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Production Credit Ass’n v. Buckentin, (to ensure uniform application, reviewing court must retain the final independent, interpretive authority to define the scope and application of those rules).
Ebenhoh v. Production Credit Ass'n 426 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ebenhoh v. Production Credit Ass'n 426 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Following the Minnesota Supreme Court’s FICB was dismissed as a party and appellants amended their complaint.