Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kronick v. Kronick, 482 N.W.2d 533.

18 citing documents.

In re the marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court must “make findings revealing its rationale on the attorney fees issue.”
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court must “make findings revealing its rationale on the [attorney-fee] issue.”
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
When a district court denies a motion for conduct-based attorney fees, findings are generally “needed to permit meaningful appellate review on the question whether attorney fees are appropriate because of a party’s conduct.”
In re the Marriage of: Clark Donald Kaml, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Mower County Health and Human Services, Petitioner, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The moving party bears the burden of establishing the unreasonableness of the other party’s behavior, Geske, d at 818, and the district court must support the award with specific findings regardin g the behavior justifying the award
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 533, 536 (Minn. App. 1992) (concluding the district court erred by failing to make proper findings in de nying requested attorney fees).
In re the Marriage of: Kerry J. Olson, a/k/a Kerry Ciardelli-Olson, n/k/a Kerry J. Ciardelli, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Matter of: J. S. S., petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Findings of fact are “needed to permit meaningful appellate review on the question whether attorney fees are appropriate because of a party’s conduct.” ().
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Stephen Joseph Moore v. Lisa Jo Jacobson, f/k/a Lisa Jo Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court must set forth findings that “permit meaningful appellate review on the question whether attorney fees are appropriate because of a party’s conduct.”
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(remanding a denial of conduct-based fees sought under Minn. Stat. § 518.14 because the findings were inadequate to support the denial).
In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt v. Tami L. Dillahunt, n/k/a Tami L. Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Thomas M. Dillahunt v. Tami L. Dillahunt, n/k/a Tami L. Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
When denying conduct-based attorney fees under Minn. Stat. § 518.14, a district court must make findings sufficient “to permit meaningful appellate review on the question [of] whether attorney fees are appropriate because of a party’s conduct.”
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Sharp v. Bilbro 614 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 2000

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by