Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. Rengachary, 608 N.W.2d 843.

43 citing documents.

Cynthia Pitchford as Trustee for the Heirs and Next-of-Kin of D-Angelo Pitchford, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Chad Darwin Koetz, Trustee for the Heirs and Next-of-Kin of Gloria Lynn Koetz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, -50 (Minn. 2000) (concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the plaintiff’s claim after the 180 -day deadline to submit an affidavit of expert identification expired); (providing that the discretion is subje
Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(holding that, in deciding whether to grant a post-deadline extension of an expert-review affidavit, a district court must consider “due diligence” and “substantial prejudice,” among other things).
Jay Maurice, as Trustee for the next-of-kin of Jon Maurice, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A “plaintiff [bears] the burden to prove, by expert testimony, that it was more probable that [plaintiff ’s injury] resulted from some negligence for which defendant was responsible than from some negligence for which he was not responsible.” (quotation omitted); n.3 (Minn. 2000) (recognizing that a plaintiff in a medical-malpractice case bears the burden of proof).
Angie M. Barsness, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
5 5 See also Anderson v. Rengachary , (stating that plaintiffs are required to “set forth by affidavit or answers to interrogatories, specific details 12 Here, t he affidavits submitted by Barsness’s experts do not satisfy the standard articulated in Ryg wall.
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
was a medical malpractice case involving a spine surgery gone wrong.
Makenzie Moore, a minor, by and through her Conservator, First Fiduciary Corporation, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
2; Anderson v. Rengachary
Joseph Kurian, individually, and as Trustee for Samael Alessandro Ittyerah, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
2; Anderson v. Rengachary
Deborah Harris, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2-4 (2016); d 843, 856 (Minn. 2000).
Larson Ventures, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
23, 2006); -50 (Minn. 4 2000) (considering motion under rule 6.02 to enlarge time for filing ex pert-identification affidavit pursuant to section 145.682, subdivision 4).
Barclays Bank Delaware, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sharon Schirmer, trustee for the next of kin of Cary F. Schirmer v. The Duluth Clinic, Ltd., d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sharon Schirmer, trustee for the next of kin of Cary F. Schirmer v. The Duluth Clinic, Ltd., d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Patricia Annette Wallace, Protected Person. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Patricia Annette Wallace, Protected Person. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Goerke Family P’-53 (Minn. App. 2014).
Mary Beth Davidson v. North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North Memorial Medical Center, and d/b/a North Memorial Ambulance … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mary Beth Davidson v. North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North Memorial Medical Center, and d/b/a North Memorial Ambulance … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy Guzick, as Personal Representative of the Estate of George J. Nyberg and as Trustee of the George … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Timothy Guzick, as Personal Representative of the Estate of George J. Nyberg and as Trustee of the George … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Bonczek v. Donald Erickson, DDS, Mark Wilson, Periodontist, Mayo Clinic - Rochester, University of Minnesota - Minneapolis, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Julie L. Pfeiffer, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Dale R. Pfeiffer v. … 851 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Julie L. Pfeiffer, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Dale R. Pfeiffer v. … 851 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Wesely v. Flor 806 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2011
Wesely v. Flor 806 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2011
Ctr., ("[D]efendants contend that plaintiffs' second affidavit did not provide sufficient detail ....” (emphasis added)); (referring to "Dr. Goodman's affidavit of expert identification”).
Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. 732 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2007
Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. 732 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2007
In Sorenson , we first announced that “[i]n borderline cases where counsel for a plaintiff identifies the experts who will testify and give[s] some meaningful disclosure of what the testimony will be, there may be less drastic alternatives to a procedural dismissal.” Id., -49 (Minn.2000), (recognizing the Sorenson “borderline” exception but holding that the case “hardly exemplified] a borderline case because the affidavit has serious deficiencies and does not provide any meaningful disclosure re
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Stroud v. Hennepin County Med.
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
-48 (Minn.2000) (expert affidavit failed to set forth standard of care, did not identify acts or omissions that violated standard of care and made no attempt to outline chain of causation resulting in injury); Lindberg, d at 578 (expert affidavit failed to state how health care providers departed from sta
Maudsley v. Pederson 676 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Maudsley v. Pederson 676 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Teffeteller v. University of Minnesota 645 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 2002
Teffeteller v. University of Minnesota 645 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 2002
Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of Rochester 642 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2002
Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of Rochester 642 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2002
(explaining that Minnesota is a notice pleading state); (Gilbert, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
Teffeteller v. University of Minnesota 626 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Teffeteller v. University of Minnesota 626 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Demgen v. Fairview Hospital 621 N.W.2d 259 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Demgen v. Fairview Hospital 621 N.W.2d 259 Minn. Ct. App. 2001

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by