Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jorgensen v. Knutson, 662 N.W.2d 893.

30 citing documents.

King’s Cove Marina, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
King’s Cove Marina, LLC, Minn. 2021
We have imposed a reasonableness requirement “to di scourage possible overreaching in Miller-Shugart settlement negotiations.” see Alton M. Johnson Co. , d at 280 (noting th at “the exposed insured has no incentive to drive a hard bargai n” in settlement negotiations if it will have no personal liability for the amount of the settlement).
In the Matter of the SIRS Appeal of Community Involvement Programs-FSE. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Robert P. Nachtsheim, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Jorgensen v. Knutson , -05 (Minn. 2003).
Hailey Elisabeth Steele Daberkow, a minor, by and through her parents and natural guardians John Daberkow and Bernadette … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Miller, d at 733-35 (establishing that insured has a right to enter into settlement relieving personal liability, and insurer has right to challenge coverage, reasonableness, and absence of fraud and collusion) ; 904 (Minn. 2003) (reviewing coverage and reasonableness of Miller-Shugart settlement in garnishment action); Emp’rs Mut.
Capistrant v. Lifetouch National School Studios, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Capistrant v. Lifetouch National School Studios, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Emily M. Pederson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Jorgensen v. Knutson , (“[Appellate court] review is limited to those issues decided by the lower court.”).
Jackson ex rel. Sorenson v. Options Residential, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jackson ex rel. Sorenson v. Options Residential, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dominic Gemelli v. Lindsey Haugen, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dominic Gemelli v. Lindsey Haugen, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gallaher v. Titler 812 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Distinguished Gallaher v. Titler 812 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
898 (Minn.2003) (stating that debtor and her husband were denied full ten days to pay insurance premium when tenth day landed on Saturday and insurance company informed them that insurance would be cancelled at 12:01 a.m.
State v. Wertheimer 781 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2010
State v. Wertheimer 781 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2010
The State cites Nelson v. Sandkamp, 227 Minn. 177 , Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 307 Minn. 159 , to support the argument that section 645.15 applies to all statutes requiring the computation of time unless another method is specifically included in the statute.
Marchio v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 747 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Marchio v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 747 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Forestview the Beautiful, Inc. v. All Nation Insurance Co. 704 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Forestview the Beautiful, Inc. v. All Nation Insurance Co. 704 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Westrom v. Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry 686 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 2004
Westrom v. Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry 686 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 2004
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Forstrom 684 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 2004
Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Forstrom 684 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 2004
Eischen Cabinet Co. v. Hildebrandt 683 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 2004
Eischen Cabinet Co. v. Hildebrandt 683 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 2004
Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners 683 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2004
Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners 683 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2004
Tollefson Development, Inc. v. City of Elk River 665 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Tollefson Development, Inc. v. City of Elk River 665 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(‘We have applied the computation statute [Minn.Stat.