Cited by

“If the government does not know of and acquiesce in the search, the search cannot be attributed to the government and the inquiry ends.”

Relevant factors to consider include “(1) whether the government knew of and acquiesced in the search and 7 (2) whether the search was conducted to assist law enforcement efforts or to further the private party’s own ends.” Id.; State v. Jorgensen , (applying two-factor test).

Moreover, “[i]f the government does not know of and acquiesce in the search, the search cannot be attributed to the government and the inquiry ends.” Pauli, d at 51 ().

Relevant factors include “(1) whether the government knew of and acquiesced in the search and (2) whether the search was conducted to assist law enforcement efforts or to further the private party’s own ends.” Id.; (applying two-factor test).

(-33 (Minn. 2003) (emphasis added)).

“If the government does not know of and acquiesce in the search, the search cannot be attributed to the government and the inquiry ends.”

Vang, d at 267; (noting that when a defendant’s attorney admits guilt without a defendant’s consent, the attorney’s “performance is deficient and prejudice is presumed” when applying Strickland).

When defense counsel admits a defendant’s guilt without the defendant’s consent, “the counsel’s performance is deficient and prejudice is presumed.”

That is so because the decision to concede a defendant’s guilt is the defendant’s decision alone to make.” (citations omitted).

That is so because the decision to concede a defendant’s guilt is the defendant’s decision alone to make.” (citations omitted).

d 127, 133 (Minn. 2003).