Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jungbauer, 348 N.W.2d 344.

45 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-04 (Minn. 1995) (concluding that confession was voluntary when appellant was questioned for approximately an hour and a half); 46-47 (Minn. 1984) (determining that a confession was voluntary when the defendant was not subject to prolonged interrogation).
State v. McDonald-Richards 840 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2013
State v. McDonald-Richards 840 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2013
-04 (Minn.1995) (concluding that a confession was voluntary when defendant was questioned for approximately an hour and a half); -47 (Minn.1984) (concluding that a confession was voluntary when the defendant was not subject to prolonged interrogation).
State v. Dressel 765 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Dressel 765 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-47 (Minn.1984) (affirming admission of confession made by defendant following polygraph examination)'.
State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
Relevant factors include the defendant’s age, maturity, intelligence, education, and experience; “the ability of the defendant to comprehend; the lack of or adequacy of warnings; the length and legality of the detention; the nature of the interrogation; whether the defendant was deprived of any physical needs; and whether the defendant was denied access to friends.” ().
State v. Bailey 677 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2004
In Re the Welfare of D.S.N. 611 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Distinguished In Re the Welfare of D.S.N. 611 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
The trial court cited, and respondent cites
State v. Ritt 599 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1999
State v. Ritt 599 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1999
State v. Wiernasz 584 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1998
State v. Wiernasz 584 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1998
In fact, while we have condemned police use of lying in interrogating suspects, we have approved the use of polygraph test results in interrogating suspects
Bixler v. State 568 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Bixler v. State 568 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Thaggard, 32, d at 808 ().
State v. Marin 541 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Marin 541 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
Thaggard, d at 808 ; -47 (Minn.1984).
State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
see Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 225-26 , 93 S.Ct.
State v. Schaeffer 457 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1990
State v. Schaeffer 457 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1990
394 , 74 L.Ed.2d 214 (1982)
State v. Schaeffer 452 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Schaeffer 452 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
State v. Barsness 446 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Anderson 404 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Anderson 404 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Criticized State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1986
State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1986
See, (the fact that defendant was told that any cooperation would be brought to the trial court’s attention did not render confession “involuntary”); (promise to release defendant pending formal charging and to summon him rather than arrest him on a warrant did not render defendant’s confession “involuntary”); (promise to a defendant that a female friend would be released from jail if he gave a written statem
State v. Eppler 362 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1985
State v. Eppler 362 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1985
The issue of the propriety and effect of such a
State v. Gard 358 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Gard 358 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
rejected a contention that the defendant’s confession was improperly obtained by a promise to release him pending formal charging and to seek only his summons instead of an arrest warrant.
State v. Beckman 354 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1984
State v. Beckman 354 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1984
More recently, we rejected a contention that the defendant’s confession was improperly obtained by a promise to release him pending formal charging and to seek only his summons instead of an arrest warrant.