Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co., 387 N.W.2d 161.

86 citing documents.

Fabyanske Westra Hart & Thomson PA v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., see also Luetmer, d at 369 (collecting cases).
Benjamin Menier, a minor, by and through Robin Menier as parent and natural guardian, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (explaining umbrella-policy coverage).
Minnesota Sporting Clays Association, a Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Hayley Elizabeth Kytta, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , (quotation omitted).
Nicholas Johnson and Michelle Johnson, individually and as parents and natural guardians of D.J., a minor, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co., –66 (Minn. 1986) (“A duty to defend an insured on a claim arises when any part of the claim is ‘arguably’ within the scope of the policy’s coverage, and an insurer who wishes to escape that duty has the burden of showing that all parts of the cause of action fall clearly outside the scope of coverage.”).
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. , –66 (Minn. 1986) (quotation omitted) .
Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Estate of Gladys I. Norby v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Company n/k/a Austin Mutual Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Estate of Gladys I. Norby v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Company n/k/a Austin Mutual Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co., -66 (Minn. 1986) (“A duty to defend an insured on a claim arises when any part of the claim is arguably within the scope of the policy’s coverage .
Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 784 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2010
Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 784 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2010
Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 766 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 766 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Donnelly Bros. Construction Co. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 759 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Bundul v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 753 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Bundul v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 753 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., The Bunduls were insured under a primary policy with limits that exceeded those required by law.
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 722 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2006
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 722 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2006
Co., -68 (Minn.1986); Iowa Nat’l Mid.
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 695 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Soo Line Railroad v. Brown's Crew Car of Wyoming 694 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Westfield Insurance Co. v. Kroiss 694 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Soo Line Railroad v. Brown's Crew Car of Wyoming 694 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co., -66 (Minn.1986) (ruling that the duty to defend a claim against an insured arises when any part of the claim is arguably within the scope of the policy’s coverage).
Westfield Insurance Co. v. Kroiss 694 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 658 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 2003
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 658 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 2003
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 644 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 644 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., (citation omitted).
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 643 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 643 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., -66 (Minn.1986) (citation omitted).
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 625 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 625 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., (“If either insurer undertakes the defense, it is responsible for its own defense costs and cannot later seek reimbursement from the other.”); Nordby, d at 824 (“An insurer has no right of action against another insurer to recover the cost of defending the insured, since there is no contractu
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 621 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 621 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., Anderson, d at 576 .
Jerry Mathison Construction, Inc. v. Binsfield 615 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jerry Mathison Construction, Inc. v. Binsfield 615 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., (loan-receipt agreements useful in disposing of insurance disputes when there has been payment); E. Michael Johnson, The Real Party Under Rule 17(a): The Loan Receipt and Insurers’ Subrogation Revisited, 74 Minn. L.Rev.
Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. Campbell 593 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. Campbell 593 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify).
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. & Affiliates v. Miller 589 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1999
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. & Affiliates v. Miller 589 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1999
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co v. Seagate Technology, Inc. 570 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co v. Seagate Technology, Inc. 570 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Walker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 569 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Walker v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 569 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., (where claim is “arguably” within scope of coverage, insurer has duty to defend).
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. 567 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co. 559 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1997