Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Sandmoen, 390 N.W.2d 419.

39 citing documents.

James Ervin Owen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-24 (Minn. App. 1986); Minn. R. Crim.
Salat Issa Salat, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Ulland, d at 347; -24 (Minn. App. 1986) ; Tlapa, d at 74.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-23 n.2 (Minn. App. 1986) (noting that “investigative reports contained 7 within a file at the time the plea was entered may be considered for the purpose of determining a factual basis for the plea, if such documentation will assist in demonstrating that a defenda
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
28, 2015); an insurance inventory of damaged property, –15 (Minn. App. 2011); and a notice of driver’s-license revocation and a traffic citation
Dustin Alan Edsill v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dustin Alan Edsill v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Kuhlmann 780 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Ehmke 752 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Ehmke 752 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See, e.g., Halseth, d at 784 ; -24 (Minn.App.1986).
State v. Rasmussen 749 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Rasmussen 749 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Knoll 739 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Knoll 739 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-87 (Minn.App.2002) (granting new trial when defendant failed to provide express waiver before trial on stipulated facts); -24 (Minn.App.1986) (noting that waiver requirements in Minn. R.Crim.
State v. Bunce 669 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Bunce 669 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Martinez 657 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Martinez 657 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Halseth 653 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Halseth 653 N.W.2d 782 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Tlapa 642 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Tlapa 642 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Vernlund v. State 589 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Vernlund v. State 589 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(“The most dangerous combination which calls for the closest scrutiny of the record is when the defendant does not have an attorney and is given the group advisory * * *.”)
State v. Balduc 514 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Balduc 514 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-24 (Minn.App.1986) (defendant proceeding under Loth-enbach must personally waive jury trial in writing or orally upon the record in open court).
State, City of Mankato v. Bloemke 412 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, City of Mankato v. Bloemke 412 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
this court held an adequate factual basis was shown by a Rule 15 petition to plead guilty, supplemented by the documents in the file at the time of the plea: Here, in addition to the petition and statement of rights, the prior record contained a notice of revocation, * * * and a traffic citati
State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Snyder 408 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Snyder 408 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State, City of Tracy v. Neuman 392 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State, City of Tracy v. Neuman 392 N.W.2d 706 Minn. Ct. App. 1986