Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Graham v. Special School District No. 1, 472 N.W.2d 114.

59 citing documents.

In Re the Custody of: D. T. E. B., DOB 10-27-2013, D'Jilorian D. Baker v. Diona Marie Hargrett,... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In Re the Custody of: D. T. E. B., DOB 10-27-2013, D'Jilorian D. Baker v. Diona Marie Hargrett,... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. Concurring, Chutich, Thissen, JJ. Lori Dowling Hanson, Minn. 2022
No. 1 , n.7 (Minn. 1991) (“ McDonnell Douglas .
John Schulz, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
No. 1 , -120 (Minn. 1 991) (holding that plaintiff in defamation action was precluded from litigating i ssue of misconduct in district court due to prior decision of school board in teacher-termination hearing).
Charity Slaughter, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
No. 1, n.7 (Minn. 1991) (stating that the McDonnell Douglas test must be used in analyzing a retaliatory-discharge claim).
Friends of Tower Hill Park, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
No. 1 , -16 (Minn. 1991) (citing McKee v. C ounty of Ramsey, n.1 (Minn. 1976)) .
Greg Peterson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
No. 1, n. 7 (Minn. 1991)).
Ann R. Majerus, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
No. 1, (emphasis added) (citations omitted).
In re the Appeal from the Order of the Joint Board of Kandiyohi and Meeker Counties Establishing a … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
No. 1 , 14 Appellant also argued three other procedural errors to the district court but does not challenge the district co urt’s rejection of these arguments on appeal.
David Brian Pemrick v. Lori Ann Bucher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
David Brian Pemrick v. Lori Ann Bucher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
No. 1, (holding collateral estoppel barred defamation action when alleged defamatory statements were found to be true in previous proceeding).
Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul 890 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul 890 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
No. 1, -16 (Minn. 1991) (stating that collateral estoppel may apply to agency’s quasi-judicial decisions and listing requirements for application of collateral estoppel).
In the Matter of the Massage and Bodywork License Application of Kim Yi's, LLC, and Yong Green d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Massage and Bodywork License Application of Kim Yi's, LLC, and Yong Green d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
No. 1, -16 (Minn. 1991) (stating collateral estoppel precludes relitigation if the issues are identical).
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 814 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 814 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Heine v. Simon 702 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Heine v. Simon 702 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Wright Electric, Inc. v. Ouellette 686 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Wright Electric, Inc. v. Ouellette 686 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
No. 1, (applying collateral estoppel where administrative hearing was presided over by an impartial hearing examiner, both parties were entitled to representation by counsel, the rules of evidence were followed, and findings had to be established by “substantial and competent evidence”).
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
13 -88 (Minn.1986), that a suit for wrongful discharge could sound in tort, and we referred to wrongful discharge as a tort action in Graham v. Special School District No. 1, 120 (Minn.1991).
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. M.B. 563 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. M.B. 563 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
No. 1, (holding that a discharged teacher’s "defamation action must be dismissed on the merits because, by reason of collateral estoppel, the alleged defamatory statements were established to be true in the teacher’s termination proceeding").
Willis v. County of Sherburne 555 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1996
Willis v. County of Sherburne 555 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1996
No. 1, this court held that when a school board was required to judge not only an employee’s conduct but also whether the school district itself had engaged in unlawful discrimination against the employee, the discharged employee was entitled to pursue her retaliatory discharge action.
Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Board of Teaching 545 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1996
Teaching License of Falgren v. State, Board of Teaching 545 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1996
No. 1, (citations omitted).
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
No. 1, , 119 n. 7 (Minn.1991); Hubbard v. United Press Int’l
Larson v. New Richland Care Center 538 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Larson v. New Richland Care Center 538 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 538 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Manteuffel v. City of North St. Paul 538 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
No. 1, a wrongful termination case in which the Minnesota Supreme Court observed: In this situation, the school board is being asked to judge not just the conduct of the employee it is proposing to discharge, but the lawfulness of the district’s own conduct as the employer.
D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. 535 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. 535 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
No. 1, (citations omitted).
Falgren v. STATE, BD. OF TEACHING 529 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Falgren v. STATE, BD. OF TEACHING 529 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
No. 1, (citations omitted).
Villarreal v. Independent School District No. 659 520 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1994
Villarreal v. Independent School District No. 659 520 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1994
No. 1, analogizing Villarreal’s racial discrimination claim to the retaliatory discharge and free speech claims which were allowed to proceed.
Randall v. Northern Milk Products, Inc. 519 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Randall v. Northern Milk Products, Inc. 519 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
No. 1, , 119 n. 7 (Minn.1991).
Villarreal v. Independent School District 659 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Villarreal v. Independent School District 659 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
No. 1, (quoting Kroll v. Independent Sch.
McGrath v. TCF Bank Savings, FSB 502 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 1993

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by