Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rainer, 502 N.W.2d 784.

93 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Mo Savoy Hicks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Lester Leander Wiechmann, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
State v. Tahash, 275 Minn. 242, 244-45
Desmon Demond Burks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Desmon Demond Burks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 784, 787 (Minn. 1993).
Jason Dean Ligtenberg v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Dean Ligtenberg v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A petitioner seeking postconviction relief has the burden of establishing, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, facts [that] warrant a reopening of the case.”
David Richard Carlson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David Richard Carlson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION I. Postconviction Claims “A petitioner seeking postconviction relief has the burden of establishing, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, facts [that] warrant a reopening of the case.”
Frank Anthony Mendoza v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Frank Anthony Mendoza v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Casey Craig Schueneman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Casey Craig Schueneman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Schueneman has the burden to establish “facts which warrant a reopening of the case.”
Jose Socorro Ortiz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jose Socorro Ortiz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Larry Roosevelt Noble v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Larry Roosevelt Noble v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Staunton v. State 784 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2010
Staunton v. State 784 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2010
(“An attorney’s failure to make a meaningless objection does not give rise to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”).
Francis v. State 781 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2010
Francis v. State 781 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2010
Leake v. State 767 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 2009
Leake v. State 767 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 2009
Sanchez-Diaz v. State 758 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2008
Sanchez-Diaz v. State 758 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2008
El-Shabazz v. State 754 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2008
El-Shabazz v. State 754 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 2008
White v. State 711 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
White v. State 711 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
“A petitioner seeking postconviction relief has the burden of establishing, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, facts which warrant a reopening of the case.” ().
Johnson v. State 697 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2005
Johnson v. State 697 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 2005
Hooper v. State 680 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2004
Hooper v. State 680 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2004
Johnson v. State 673 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2004
Johnson v. State 673 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2004
Ives v. State 655 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2003
Ives v. State 655 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2003
See, e.g., Boitnott, d at 370-71 (failure to investigate, prepare for trial, and raise timely objections); (defenses raised at trial); (which witnesses are called and what information is presented to the jury).
King v. State 649 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2002
King v. State 649 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2002
Bolinger v. State 647 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Bolinger v. State 647 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Ferguson v. State 645 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2002
Ferguson v. State 645 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2002
Boitnott v. State 640 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2002
Boitnott v. State 640 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2002
SHERN v. State 635 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 2001

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by