Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Miller v. Miller, 352 N.W.2d 738.

58 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
But, the supreme court has “repeatedly stated that the [district] court should not speculate about possible tax consequences.” Aaron, d at 153.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
However, the supreme court has “repeatedly stated that the [district] court should not speculate about possible tax consequences.” (citing O’Brien v. O’Brien , Aaron v. Aaron , ).
In the Marriage of: Deborah J. Schmitt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Miller v. Miller , O’Brien, d at 854; Aaron, d at 153; Salstrom, d at 853.
In re the Marriage of: Curtis Glenn Marks, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Sonya Sebring Stylos v. Lee Stylos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Sonya Sebring Stylos v. Lee Stylos Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(noting that the review of tax consequences is within a district court’s discretion and opposing such consideration if the district court is presented with insufficient evidence to make an adequately informed decision on the point); (“Although it is within the discretion of the trial court to consider the tax consequences .
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tarah Ann Aanerud v. James Richard Aanerud Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The court must have sufficient information that the actual tax liability resulting from the property division can be calculated with a reasonable degree of certainty.”
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
can be calculated with a reasonable degree of certainty.”
In re the Marriage of: Charles A. T. Gill v. Kathryn E. K. Gill Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Charles A. T. Gill v. Kathryn E. K. Gill Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Minnesota law presumes that at the dissolution of a long-term marriage, “equal division of the wealth accumulated through the joint efforts of the parties is appropriate.”
Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Maurer v. Maurer 623 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 2001
Maurer v. Maurer 623 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 2001
See Aaron, d at 153 ; O’Brien v. O’Brien
Marriage of Pfleiderer v. Pfleiderer 591 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Marriage of Pfleiderer v. Pfleiderer 591 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(equal division of assets accumulated through joint efforts appropriate for long-term marriage).
Marriage of Koenen v. Koenen 413 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Koenen v. Koenen 413 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Batsell v. Batsell 410 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Batsell v. Batsell 410 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Weikle v. Weikle 403 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Weikle v. Weikle 403 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 399 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kaste v. Kaste 399 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Buhr v. Buhr 395 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Buhr v. Buhr 395 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Jungbauer v. Jungbauer 391 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Jungbauer v. Jungbauer 391 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nardini v. Nardini 385 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nardini v. Nardini 385 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wilson v. Wilson 388 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wilson v. Wilson 388 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in dividing the marital property equally between the parties, or in apportioning to Wilson the debts he incurred for his own purposes
Vinnes v. Vinnes 384 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Vinnes v. Vinnes 384 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The Minnesota Supreme Court recently stated that “equal division of the wealth accumulated through the joint efforts of the parties is appropriate on dissolution of a long term marriage.”
Marriage of Ranik v. Ranik 383 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ranik v. Ranik 383 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Quick v. Quick 381 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Quick v. Quick 381 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nemitz v. Nemitz 376 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Nemitz v. Nemitz 376 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“[I]t is within the discretion of the trial court to consider the tax consequences of its property division ⅝ * ⅜.”
Marriage of Brockman v. Brockman 373 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Brockman v. Brockman 373 N.W.2d 664 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Cronin v. Cronin 372 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Cronin v. Cronin 372 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 1985