Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sigurdson v. Isanti County, 386 N.W.2d 715.

212 citing documents.

Klink v. Ramsey County Ex Rel. Zacharias 397 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schlemmer v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 397 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schlemmer v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. 397 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Because of the significance of factual issues in employment discrimination cases and the discretion given trial courts making determinations on these issues, the basis for the court’s decision must “be set forth clearly and explicitly so that an appellate court can conduct effective and meaningful review.”
Klink v. Ramsey County Ex Rel. Zacharias 397 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Certain attitudes, beliefs, language and conduct by some persons will often be offensive and objectionable to others.” Just before submission of the case, to the attention of the trial court.
Khalifa v. State 397 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Shea v. Hanna Mining Co. 397 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Shea v. Hanna Mining Co. 397 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-22 (Minn.1986); (analysis first adopted).
Khalifa v. State 397 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bowen v. Superwood Corp. 395 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bowen v. Superwood Corp. 395 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
require the court to make certain express findings pertaining to her Human Rights Act claims, and that the court failed to make these findings.
Carlson v. Independent School District No. 623 392 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1986
Carlson v. Independent School District No. 623 392 N.W.2d 216 Minn. 1986
See, Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.