Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sigurdson v. Isanti County, 386 N.W.2d 715.

212 citing documents.

Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Bauer v. Republic Airlines, Inc. 442 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Bauer v. Republic Airlines, Inc. 442 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hubbard, v. United Press International, Inc., .
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin County 441 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1989
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin County 441 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1989
When this court has applied the McDonnell test in the past it has stated that the test would only be used for "disparate treatment claims brought under the Minnesota Human Rights Act.” -20 (Minn.1986).
Albertson v. FMC Corp. 437 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Albertson v. FMC Corp. 437 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Stiff v. Associated Sewing Supply Co. 436 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1989
Stiff v. Associated Sewing Supply Co. 436 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1989
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 433 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 433 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
After two previous appeals, this court held that appellant was discriminated against in regard to advancement.
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Mower County Social Services 434 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Mower County Social Services 434 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Ridler v. Olivia Public School System No. 653 432 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ridler v. Olivia Public School System No. 653 432 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kresko v. Rulli 432 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kresko v. Rulli 432 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc. 429 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc. 429 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rademacher v. FMC Corp. 431 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Rademacher v. FMC Corp. 431 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-22 (Minn.1986); -400 (Minn.1978) (analysis first adopted).
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin County 425 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin County 425 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 425 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 425 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1988
It held, pursuant to this court’s that commissions, as well as trial courts, must apply, in employment discrimination cases, the analysis set forth by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct.
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Ramsey County 424 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Disparate-treatment analysis “consists of a prima facie case, an answer, and a rebuttal.” (relying on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct.
Deerson v. Metal-Matic, Inc. 423 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Deerson v. Metal-Matic, Inc. 423 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
1817, 1824-25 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)
State Ex Rel. Khalifa v. Hennepin County 420 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State Ex Rel. Khalifa v. Hennepin County 420 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co. 417 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1988
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co. 417 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1988
Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 417 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 417 N.W.2d 288 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Manderscheid v. Beyer 413 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Manderscheid v. Beyer 413 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The trial court, which did not determine whether arthritis was a disability placing Manderscheid in a protected class, -22 (Minn.1986).
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 408 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 408 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
holding that in employment discrimination cases based on disparate treatment and brought under the Human Rights Act, trial courts must make findings of fact and conclusions of law that explicitly apply the three-step analysis set out in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct.
Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mpls. Police Dept. v. Mpls. Civ. Rights Com'n 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co. 401 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co. 401 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State ex rel. Johnson v. City of Duluth 402 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State ex rel. Johnson v. City of Duluth 402 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights 402 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 399 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bersie v. Zycad Corp. 399 N.W.2d 141 Minn. Ct. App. 1987