Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sivertson v. Sims Security, Inc., 390 N.W.2d 868.

34 citing documents.

Jay D. Demars v. Renegade Truck Equipment, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Renae Lynn Hagen v. Coast to Coast Logistics, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Furthermore, whether “other employees violated [the] same rules and were disciplined or discharged is not relevant .” Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Noelle Erling v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Noelle Erling v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Marcel Vaudrin v. Tri-Valley Opportunity Council, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Nathan M. Christenson v. RIHM Motor Company, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
But “[v]iolation of an employer’s rules by other employees is not a valid defense to a claim of misconduct.” see also Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc. , (“Whether or not other employees violated [the employer’s] same rules and were disciplined or discharged is not relevant.”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Karen M. Erickson v. Legacy of Delano, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc. , 71 (Minn. App. 1986), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Dennis Field v. Casey’s Services Co., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Todd Leuze v. Minnesota Valley Alfalfa Producers, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., (stating that employer’s alleged selective enforcement of workplace rules is not a defense to employee misconduct), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Walter Nachtigall v. Marriott International, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
Robb W. Jezierski v. St. Mary’s/Duluth Clinic Health System (Corp), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Thomas Kutschke v. O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Ryan Wille v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co (Corp), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
James Treptau v. Federal Cartridge Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1, 2008) (stating that ULJ need not find actual harm resulting from relator’s misconduct); Sivertson v. Sims Security, Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
Sheila Fangel v. Health Partners, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sheila Fangel v. Health Partners, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But “[h]arm is not necessary for a determination of misconduct.” Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., d 868, 871 (Minn. App. 1986), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Kimberly G. Baker v. Minnesota State Supreme Court, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kimberly G. Baker v. Minnesota State Supreme Court, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., (“Whether or not other employees violated those same rules and were disciplined or discharged is not relevant here.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Tiffany Montgomery v. AT & T Mobility Services, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tiffany Montgomery v. AT & T Mobility Services, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
see also Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., d 868, 871 (Minn. App. 1986) (stating that whether or not other employees violated same rules and were disciplined or discharged was not relevant to the present case), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Jayne M. Eiden-Kellam v. Mayo Clinic Health System – Fairmont, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Patricia Medal v. Agassiz Federal Credit Union, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Patricia Medal v. Agassiz Federal Credit Union, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Further, “[h]arm is not necessary for a determination of misconduct.” Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
Jayne M. Eiden-Kellam v. Mayo Clinic Health System – Fairmont, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., (“Whether or not other employees violated those same rules and were disciplined or discharged is not relevant here.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Jacqueline Crosser v. McAlpin Agency, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jacqueline Crosser v. McAlpin Agency, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But “[h]arm is not necessary for a determination of misconduct.” Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., review denied (Minn. Aug.
James Richardson Jr. v. Alamco Wood Products LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Steven Morris Smith v. Family Life Mental Health Center, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
James Richardson Jr. v. Alamco Wood Products LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., (whether employer chose to enforce rules against only one employee is irrelevant in determining whether employee engaged in misconduct), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Steven Morris Smith v. Family Life Mental Health Center, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
5 Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc., (declining to consider employee’s argument that his employer selectively chose to enforce the rules against him), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Wilson v. Comfort Bus Co., Inc. 491 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Wilson v. Comfort Bus Co., Inc. 491 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Sivertson v. Sims Sec., Inc.
Turnquist v. Amoco Oil Co. 397 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Turnquist v. Amoco Oil Co. 397 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
pet for rev. denied, (Minn. Aug.