Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 659 N.W.2d 748.

25 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-53 (Minn. 2003) (concluding district court’s imposition of mandatory-conditional release term does not require any additional fact finding); -49 (Minn. 2001) (holding defendant’s due-process rights were not violated when district court amended defendant’s sentence to inclu
Nikita Nikel Dixon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Meger 901 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 2017
State v. Meger 901 N.W.2d 418 Minn. 2017
The court of appeals affirmed, holding that Her applies retroactively because it *421 was “merely 'an application of the Sixth Amendment jury-trial right that governed the Minnesota Supreme Court’s previous decisions in” and U.S. Supreme Court Sixth Amendment precedent.
State of Minnesota v. Jack Warren Nomeland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Jack Warren Nomeland Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Appellant argues that remand for a as support for his argument.
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Robert Politano Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Robert Politano Minn. Ct. App. 2016
N.W.2d 545, 551 (Minn. 2001) (determining Apprendi required that type of findings needed to impose enhanced punishment under Minnesota’s statute increased sentences for certain sex offenders be found by jury); –54 (Minn. 2003) (determining that imposition of conditional-release term constituted sentence for purposes of Apprendi and Blakely).
State of Minnesota v. Brian William Meger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brian William Meger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ge Her 862 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ge Her 862 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2015
Frederick Francis Garrison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Frederick Francis Garrison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The five-year conditional-release term is a ‘mandatory aspect of the sentence to be imposed by the district court.’” (), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Maiers v. Roy 847 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Maiers v. Roy 847 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The five-year conditional-release term is a “mandatory aspect of the sentence to be imposed by the district court.”
State v. Ge Her 843 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Ge Her 843 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
to support his argument.
Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
(concluding that the 5-year conditional release term required under Minn.Stat.
O'MEARA v. State 679 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 2004
O'MEARA v. State 679 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 2004
Stone v. State 675 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Stone v. State 675 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 2004