Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roehrdanz v. Brill, 682 N.W.2d 626.

69 citing documents.

Joseph Dixon v. Comcast Corp., d/b/a XFinity Mobile Minn. Ct. App. 2026
District courts have discretion in deciding whether to grant default judgments, and in enforcing the time limits for motion practice, Minn. Gen.
Solution Blue Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Hmong American Veterans Park Inc., Northwest Asphalt Inc., Rapp Land Surveying … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Raymond Semler v. Susan Johnson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Hiscox Insurance Company Minn. 2023
Instead, the district court did exactly what it was suppose d to do: “ma[k]e findings of fact based upon conflicting evidence and appl[y] the correct Finden analysis to those findings.”
Judith Barnes v. William Ordus Barnes Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Default Judgment “This court will not overturn a ruling on a motion to vacate a default judgment unless the district court abused its discretion.”
Phillip T. Kruger (A22-0348), Harvey Kruger, et al. (A22-0349) v. Kevin Nordquist (A22-0349), Heron Lake Watershed District, Acting … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of V & J Farm, LLC and the Commissioner of North Fork Crow River Watershed … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Richard W Bandimere, et al v. Anita Summerville, A Summerville Realty Corporation d/b/a Summerville Realty Group Minn. Ct. App. 2021
R.P. AIR, INC., et al v. Great Gulf Corporation, Jane Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Whether service of process was effective, and personal jurisdiction therefore exists, is a question of law that we review de novo.” Shamrock Dev., 382 (Minn. 2008) (citing Roehrdanz v. Brill , ).
Lariat Companies, Inc. v. Barbara Wigley, Michael Wigley Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See, e.g., Roehrdanz v. Brill
Timothy Gieseke, et al v. Nicollet County Drainage Authority for County Ditch No. 86A Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Tammy Kirkpatrick, et al v. Meeker County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Roehrdanz v. Brill , (“Whether service of process was effective is a question of law that we review de novo.”).
Beverly S. Lundberg v. Shelly J. Brown, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
521(b)(1)-(2); (service of process meets removal requirement “by either personal service or service by first-class mail”).
In re the Matter of: David Allen Engh v. Jennifer Culver, Ramsey County, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Appellate courts “will not overturn a ruling on a motion to vacate a default judgment unless the district court abused its discretion.” Roehrdanz v. Brill
Kelbro Company v. Vinny’s on the River, LLC, River Fun LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. C., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N “[An appellate court] will not overturn a rulin g on a motion to vacate a default judgment unless the district court abused its discretion.” d 626, 631 (Minn. 2004).
Larry Lake, et al v. Hibbing Community College, et al., Brian Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Denial of Motion to Vacate Minnesota appellate courts “will not overturn a ruling on a motion to vacate a default judgment unless the district court abused its discretion.” d 626, 631 (Minn. 2004).
Sherdell Jean Leshoure v. 2003 GMC Yukon, MN LIC 399 CCP, VIN 2GKEK13Z93J209465 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sherdell Jean Leshoure v. 2003 GMC Yukon, MN LIC 399 CCP, VIN 2GKEK13Z93J209465 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
in order to remove a case to district court, the aggrieved party must (1) serve on the opposing party by first- class mail or personal service a demand for removal of the cause to district court for a 3 trial de novo and (2) “[f]ile with the court administrator the original demand for removal with proof of service.” (service of process meets removal requirement “by either personal service or service by first-class mail”).
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr., Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Steven Ronald Houghton, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 884 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2016
(affirming the district court’s denial of relief because the district court “made findings of fact based upon conflicting evidence [as to whether there was a reasonable excuse] and applied the correct Finden analysis to those findings”); Standard Oil Co. v. King, 238 Minn. 81, 83
S. Robideau Construction, Inc. v. John E. Hiber, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
S. Robideau Construction, Inc. v. John E. Hiber, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[Appellate] court[s] will not overturn a ruling on a motion to vacate a default judgment unless the district court abused its discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
–32 (Minn. 2004) (“The discretion of the district court in opening a default judgment is particularly broad when the court’s decision is based upon an evaluation of conflicting affidavits.”); see also Straus v. Straus, 254 Minn. 234, 235, (“The general rule that upon appeal the e
Unifund CCR, LLC, as assignee of Pilot Receivables Management, LLC v. Jeffrey A. Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Unifund CCR, LLC, as assignee of Pilot Receivables Management, LLC v. Jeffrey A. Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION “[An appellate] court will not overturn a ruling on a motion to vacate a default judgment unless the district court abused its discretion.” d 626, 631 (Minn. 2004).
Alan B. Fish, P. A v. Scott Janson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Alan B. Fish, P. A v. Scott Janson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION “[An appellate] court will not overturn a ruling on a motion to vacate a default judgment unless the district court abused its discretion.” d 626, 631 (Minn. 2004); see also Roe v. Widme, 191 Minn. 251, 253, 254 N.W.
Rebecca J. Adams, et al., John Crudele, et al v. James Koch, et al., Steve Hyland, Erik Ostigaard, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rebecca J. Adams, et al., John Crudele, et al v. James Koch, et al., Steve Hyland, Erik Ostigaard, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“This court will not overturn a ruling on a motion to vacate a default judgment unless the district court abused its discretion.”
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton v. Herbert Thornton, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.M.M., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.M.M., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Analog Technologies Corp. v. Edward Knutson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Analog Technologies Corp. v. Edward Knutson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lyon Financial Services, Inc., d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group with its principal offices at Marshall, Minnesota … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lyon Financial Services, Inc., d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group with its principal offices at Marshall, Minnesota … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION I. “This court will not overturn a ruling on a motion to vacate a default judgment unless the district court abused its discretion.”
Pearlene Willis v. Larkins Construction, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Pearlene Willis v. Larkins Construction, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
5 Moreover, “[t]he discretion of the district court in opening a default judgment is particularly broad when the court’s decision is based upon an evaluation of conflicting affidavits.” -32 (Minn. 2004).
Laxman S. Sundae v. Jacob Salhus, Stacey Smith, Ryan Naddy Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Laxman S. Sundae v. Jacob Salhus, Stacey Smith, Ryan Naddy Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
It is true that, when determining whether a complaint survives a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, we are not bound by the legal conclusions pleaded, Hebert, d at 235 , and that adequacy of service is an issue of law
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Douglas Drews v. Federal National Mortgage Association 850 N.W.2d 738 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
ANALYSIS “Whether service of process was effective is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo.”
Zirnhelt v. Carter 843 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2014