Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Doe v. F.P., Diocese of Winona, 667 N.W.2d 493.

26 citing documents.

Julie Massaquoi v. Abe Al-Qudeh Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Julie Massaquoi v. Abe Al-Qudeh Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“If a district court denies a motion to amend on the ground of futility, our review of the district court’s ruling ‘may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.’” U.S. Bank, d at 705 (-01 (Minn. App. 2003), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Raymond Semler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Whether the district court has abused its discretion in ruling on a motion to amend may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.” -01 (Minn. App. 2003), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Mark Krampf, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
But “[w]hether the district court has abused its discretion in ruling on a motion to amend may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.” - 01 (Minn. App. 2003), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Ridgewood Bay Resort, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Whether the district court has abused its discretion in ruling on a motion to amend may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.” -01 (Minn. App. 2003) (), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(reversing and remanding denial of a mo tion for leave to amend after concluding that “the district court was incorrect in its underlying legal ruling”), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Aaron Olson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Whether the district c ourt has abused its discretion on a motion to amend may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.” -01 (Minn. App. 2003), rev. denied , (Minn. Oct.
Michael Noel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the district court has abused its discretion in ruling on a motion to amend may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.” -01 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Oct.
A18-0391 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the district court has abused its discretion in ruling on a motion to amend may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.” –01 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Ellen Kalahar-Grissom, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(remanding on appeal 3 Even so, we are not persuaded that appellants extinguished the roadway easement created when mother conveyed parcel B to appellants.
Jane Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul , Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm , (involving allegations of sexual abuse); (involving sexual conduct between plaintiff and priest); review denied (Minn. Oct.
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … 888 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … 888 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If a district court denies a motion to amend on the ground of futility, our review of the district court’s ruling “may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.” -01 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Oct.
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If a district court denies a motion to amend on the ground of futility, our review of the district court’s ruling “may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.” -01 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Pro-T, LLC v. C O Brown Agency, Inc. d/b/a Lawrence-Bohmbach Insurance Agency, a "Trusted Source" Independent Insurance Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Pro-T, LLC v. C O Brown Agency, Inc. d/b/a Lawrence-Bohmbach Insurance Agency, a "Trusted Source" Independent Insurance Agency Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.2d 704, 711 (Minn. App. 2009) (reversing summary judgment for defendant, which judgment resulted from district court’s failure to apply rebuttable presumption in plaintiff’s favor, and remanding for district court to reconsider plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment after determining whether defendant 5 rebutted presumption); 500 (Minn. App. 2003) (reversing summary judgment with respect to claims dismissed based on district court’s erroneous conclusion that statutes were unconstitutiona
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Whether the district court has abused its discretion in ruling on a motion to amend may turn on whether it was correct in an underlying legal ruling.” – 01 (Minn. App. 2003), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Lender, 266 Minn. 561, 564 , (“Whether a communication is of a religious or spiritual nature is a question of fact frequently addressed by the courts in the context of the application of the clergy privilege.”), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Lickteig v. Kolar 782 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2010
Lickteig v. Kolar 782 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2010
498 (Minn.App.2003) (addressing "claims ...
State v. Bussmann 741 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2007
State v. Bussmann 741 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2007
As to the Establishment Clause claim, the court of appeals relied on its previous decision, that the clergy sexual conduct statute did not foster “excessive governmental entanglement with religion,” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In Re the Welfare of C.P.W. 601 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1999

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by