Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Kreidler v. Kreidler, 348 N.W.2d 780.

82 citing documents.

In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
District courts are 8 “guided by equitable considerations in distributing rights and liabilities.”
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
District courts are “guided by equitable considerations in distributing rights and liabilities.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
District courts should be “guided by equitable considerations in distributing rights and liabilities.”
Kriesel v. Gustafson 513 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Kriesel v. Gustafson 513 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marriage of Bliss v. Bliss 493 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Bliss v. Bliss 493 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Fuller v. Glover 414 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Fuller v. Glover 414 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Southwell v. Southwell 413 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Southwell v. Southwell 413 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(citing Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476, 478 , ).
Marriage of O'Donnell v. O'Donnell 412 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of O'Donnell v. O'Donnell 412 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Trial court discretion on this issue is based on the principle that courts should be “ ‘guided by equitable consideration in distributing rights and liabilities.’ ” () (emphasis in original).
Marriage of Melina v. Melina 411 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Melina v. Melina 411 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Batsell v. Batsell 410 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Batsell v. Batsell 410 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The division of property must be affirmed if it has a “reasonable and acceptable basis in fact and principle.” -83 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) ().
Marriage of Salstrom v. Salstrom 404 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Salstrom v. Salstrom 404 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Musielewicz v. Musielewicz 400 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Musielewicz v. Musielewicz 400 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Stromberg v. Stromberg 397 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Stromberg v. Stromberg 397 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Erler v. Erler 390 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Erler v. Erler 390 N.W.2d 316 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schuck v. Schuck 390 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Schuck v. Schuck 390 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kennedy, d at 704 (-83 (Minn.Ct.App.1984)).
Marriage of Doering v. Doering 385 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Doering v. Doering 385 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Hattstrom v. Hattstrom 385 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
A trial court should be “guided by equitable considerations in distributing rights and liabilities.” ().
Moylan v. Moylan 384 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1986
Moylan v. Moylan 384 N.W.2d 859 Minn. 1986
However, and in subsequent cases, see, the addition of subdivision 5 to Minn. Stat. § 518.17 by chapter 308, § 17 of the 1983 Laws of Minnesota and the amendment to that subdivision brought by chapter
Vinnes v. Vinnes 384 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Vinnes v. Vinnes 384 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pekarek v. Pekarek 384 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage Of: Thomas v. Thomas 383 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pekarek v. Pekarek 384 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage Of: Thomas v. Thomas 383 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Thompson v. Newman 383 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Thompson v. Newman 383 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
as authority for excluding rental income when computing income for purposes of applying the child support guidelines.
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 383 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Stroh v. Stroh 383 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Larson v. Larson 383 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476, 478 , ).
Marriage of Stroh v. Stroh 383 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Dicks v. Dicks 380 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Dicks v. Dicks 380 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Dinwiddie v. Dinwiddie 379 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Dinwiddie v. Dinwiddie 379 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-85 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) (this court noted that the trial court did not consider the obligor’s overtime and rental income in computing child support and still affirmed the trial court’s award of child support).