Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 347 N.W.2d 72.

24 citing documents.

Jordan L. Oslund, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(stating that a determination of ineligibility is “final unless an appeal therefrom is filed by a claimant or employer within 15 days after the mailing of the notice of the determination to his last known address or personal delivery of the notice” and applying Minn. Stat. § 268.10, subd.
Chue Her, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc. , accord Minn. Stat. § 268.105, 4 subd.
In the Matter of: Diana Murack. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
2(f).2 We have held that “[t]he statutory time for an appeal from a department determination is absolute.” Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc. , (construing predecessor statute with similar language to Minn. Stat. § 268.101, subd.
Nancy Peterson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc., accord Minn. Stat. § 268.105, subd.
A20-0613 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc ., (“The statutory time for an appeal from a department determination is absolute.”).
Shawn O’Toole, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc., see also Dep’t of Emp’t Sec.
In the Matter of: Mohamed Abdirahman. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
If a relator misses the deadline to appeal by just one day, we have held that “[t]here is no provision for ex tension or exceptions.” Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc. , 73 (Minn. App. 1984); see also Kennedy v. Am.
In the Matter of: Tracy Toulouse. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Smith v. Masterson Pers., Inc. , Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
Renee Rodgers, Relator v. Childrens Dental Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Renee Rodgers, Relator v. Childrens Dental Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
Diane Quick, Relator v. Polar Semiconductor, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Diane Quick, Relator v. Polar Semiconductor, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Although we recognize that relator, as a lay person, may easily have misunderstood the communications she received from DEED, the law does not permit extensions of the 20-day time limit, and the time for appeal “is absolute.” Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
Andstrom v. Willmar Regional Treatment Center 512 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Andstrom v. Willmar Regional Treatment Center 512 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
Nieszner v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & Training 499 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Nieszner v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & Training 499 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
Smith v. Masterson Personnel, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Smith v. Masterson Personnel, Inc. 483 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See, -71 (Minn. App.1984); Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc.
White Elephant v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 474 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
White Elephant v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training 474 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See, e.g., Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc., Grewe v. Comm’r of Economic Security
Johnson v. Metropolitan Medical Center 395 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Johnson v. Metropolitan Medical Center 395 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc., this court said the time for appeal from a Department determination is absolute and there are no provisions for extensions or exceptions.
Baldinger Baking Co. v. Stepan 354 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Baldinger Baking Co. v. Stepan 354 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cole v. Holiday Inns, Inc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by