Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Willis, 376 N.W.2d 427.

44 citing documents.

Juan Humberto Castillo-Alvarez, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
at 345-46 (concluding that defendant was not entitled to credit for time spent in custody in the Red Lake Nation in connection with separate Red Lake 8 crimes); -29 (Minn. 1985) (concluding that defendant was not entitled to credit for time spent in custody in Illinois “on Illinois charges unrelated to the Minnesota offenses”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, e.g., Roy, d at 344-47 (sentence imposed after revocation of stay of imposition); -16 (Minn. 1985) (sentence imposed after conviction); -29 (Minn. 1985) (sentence imposed after conviction).3 We have discovered no cases applying the jurisdictional rule to bar an award of interjurisdictional custody credit to effectuate a sentence correction.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
To determine whether a defendant can receive custody credit for interjurisdictional custody, Minnesota courts apply the “solely- in-connection-with” test—“a defendant can only receive credit for time spent in the custody of another jurisdiction if the time was served solely in connection with the Minnesota offense.” Id.; accord State v. Willis, 5 (holding that a defendant charged with a crime in Minnesota and detained in another state at the request of Minnesota authorities is not entitled to cr
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
” Id.; (holding that a defendant charged with a crime in Minnesota and detained in another state at the request of Minnesota authorities is 5 not entitled to credit against a Minnesota sentence for time in custody in the other state unless the Minnesota charge was the sole reason the defendant was held
A19-0270 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Roy 928 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2019
State v. Roy 928 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2019
Linehan v. Wood , , 342 (Minn. 1986) ; State v. Willis , , 428-29 (Minn. 1985) ; State v. Brown , , 748 (Minn. 1984).
State v. Roy 920 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Roy 920 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Willis , , 428-29 (Minn. 1985).
Jonathon Duane Taylor Hanson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
.” State v. Willis , d 427, 428 n.1 (Minn. 1985).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Lorraine Peltier Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Lorraine Peltier Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he defendant carries the burden of establishing that [s]he is entitled to jail credit.” n.1 (Minn. 1985).
State of Minnesota v. Jesus Ivan Torres-Lopez, a/k/a Jesus Ivan Lopez-Torres Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jesus Ivan Torres-Lopez, a/k/a Jesus Ivan Lopez-Torres Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In State v. Willis, the supreme court stated that “[custody] credit should be given for time spent in jail in another state solely in connection with the offense of sentencing.” (emphasis added).
State of Minnesota v. Armando Jesus Pedraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Armando Jesus Pedraza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Clarkin 804 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Clarkin 804 N.W.2d 148 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Garcia 683 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2004
State v. Garcia 683 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2004
State v. Garcia 670 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Garcia 670 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Razmyslowski 668 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Razmyslowski 668 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Bradley 629 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Bradley 629 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Akbar 419 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Akbar 419 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Parr 414 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Parr 414 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Mavis 405 N.W.2d 547 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Mavis 405 N.W.2d 547 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Kroonblawd 400 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Kroonblawd 400 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Ex Rel. Linehan v. Wood 397 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1986
State Ex Rel. Linehan v. Wood 397 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1986
The trial court denied the petition
State ex rel. Linehan v. Wood 394 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State ex rel. Linehan v. Wood 394 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
428 & n. 1 (Minn.1985).
State v. Zaycheck 386 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Zaycheck 386 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1986