Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Laumann v. Laumann, 400 N.W.2d 355.

20 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Debra Jean Berndt-Tuttle, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Life Insurance The parties agree that the district court has “discretion to consider whether the circumstances that justify an award of maintenance also justify securing it with life insurance.” Laumann v. Laumann , (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: John A. Laumann, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
3 (2020) (“Where there is some uncertainty as to the necessity of a permanent award, the court shall order a permanent award leaving its order open for later modification.”) ; (reversing and remanding for permanent maintenance when wife’s future income was uncertain), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“The [district] court has discretion to consider whether the circum stances justifying an award of maintenance also justify securing it with life insurance.”), review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Larry Allan Keeler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The [district] court has discretion to consider whether the circumstances justifying an award of maintenance also justify securing it with life insurance.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Robert Joseph Hoolihan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
21, 2007); review denied (Minn. Nov.
In re the Marriage of: Michelle E. Li-Kuehne, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
For instance, in Laumann v. Laumann, this court wrote that district courts have “discretion to consider whether the circumstances justifying an award of maintenance also justify sec uring it with life insurance.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf 732 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf 732 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
The district court “has discretion to consider whether the circumstances justifying an award of maintenance also justify securing it with life insurance.” rev iew denied (Minn. Nov.
Walker v. Walker 553 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Walker v. Walker 553 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
The district court “has the discretion to consider whether the circumstances justifying an award of maintenance also justify securing it with life insurance.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
Maeder v. Maeder 480 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Maeder v. Maeder 480 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The trial court has discretion to determine “whether the circumstances justifying an award of maintenance also justify securing it with life insurance.” pet.
Head v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 449 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Head v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 449 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Reif v. Reif 426 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Reif v. Reif 426 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(“Being capable of employment and being appropriately employed are not synonymous”); -60 (Minn.Ct.App.1987) (finding on future income from a new career speculative and unsupported by the evidence).
Marriage of Theroux v. Boehmler 410 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Theroux v. Boehmler 410 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Flynn v. Flynn 402 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Flynn v. Flynn 402 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“The legislature has made clear that [the parties’ standard of living] is an important consideration, by repeatedly including it within the maintenance statute.”