Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Valentine v. Lutz, 512 N.W.2d 868.

29 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.K., Parent Minn. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.K., Parent Minn. 2026
(“We believe the decision to allow persons to intervene other than those allowed by our rule or statute is one that should remain within the sound discretion of the trial court.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The supreme court has recognized that former foster parents’ knowledge of a child may be relevant to an intervention motion because they “may have information which can assist a trial court in making its decisions in a CHIPS proceedings.”
In Re the Custody of: KCDC DOB 1-9-2018, Kristin Annette Vanderheyden, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M.L.S., C.V.R., and P.H., Commissioner of Human Services, … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
2(a) (2020); (emphasizing that courts must be 2 The county’s brief notes that X’s adoption is “on hold” pending this appeal.
In re the Matter of: Minn. 2021
(explaining that the “property or transaction” language in Rule 24.01 “more appropriately applies to interests involved in traditional civil actions, such as in contracts and torts, rather than the very personal and family interests” involved in a family law matte r).
In re the Guardianship of Paul Yankowiak, Jr., Ward. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Jennifer Schroeder, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: Q. S. M. and T. R. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2(a), (b)(2)); (holding that a district cou rt must be guided by the principle that the best interests of the child are paramount when considering whether to permit the intervention of foster parents).
Aaron Carlson Corp. v. Cohen 919 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Aaron Carlson Corp. v. Cohen 919 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(footnote omitted) ), aff'd sub nom., Valentine v. Lutz
J.W. ex rel. D.W. v. C.M. 627 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Jw v. Cm 627 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Jw v. Cm 627 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(addressing intervention as a matter of right).
J.W. ex rel. D.W. v. C.M. 627 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Although appellant argues that the foster-parent/child relationship is insufficient to support the permissive intervention granted by the district court here, the supreme court has recognized that, where intervention was sought as a matter of right, “[i]n certain circumstances, it may be appropriate for a [district] court to allow foster parents to intervene ⅞ * (addressing intervention as a matter of right).
Halverson Ex Rel. Halverson v. Taflin 617 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Halverson Ex Rel. Halverson v. Taflin 617 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Van Meveren v. Van Meveren 603 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Marriage of Van Meveren v. Van Meveren 603 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
former foster parents attempted to intervene as of right in a Child in Need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) proceeding.
Marriage of Frauenshuh v. Giese 599 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1999
Marriage of Frauenshuh v. Giese 599 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1999
Geibe v. Geibe 571 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Geibe v. Geibe 571 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Adoption of C.H. 548 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Adoption of C.H. 548 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
“Good cause” is considered “in light of the facts.” aff 'd sub nom.
DeGrande v. Demby 529 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
DeGrande v. Demby 529 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Id.; -54 (Minn.1994); (rules of civil procedure do not modify or enlarge substantive rights), aff'd