CX-93-653 Precedential Dismissed Processed

In Re Petition for Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Dickson

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed February 7, 2003 · 656 N.W.2d 383

Also decided on this docket: Minn., June 6, 1996 547 N.W.2d 894

Cited by

In the Matter of the Application of Jason Kitzman and Rani Kitzman for a … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Patrick A Lease, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Application of Arbor Creek Holdings, LLC, for a Conditional … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Application of Dairy Ridge, LLC, for a Conditional Use … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
KSR Investment, LLC, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Thomas Coleman v. City of Stillwater, RMR of Stillwater, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of Stevens County for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Application of Jim Goodpaster and Sherry Timmermann Goodpaster for … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Roger Francis Miller, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Thomas Behrends, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Application of USS Great River Solar LLC for an … Minn. Ct. App. 2022

all 51 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Schwardt v. County of Watonwan 656 N.W.2d 383

Opinion text

ORDER Edward B. Dickson through his attorney has advised the court that he desires to withdraw his petition for reinstatement to the practice of law, and the Director has advised the court that he has no objection to dismissal of the petition without prejudice. Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Edward B. Dickson for reinstatement in the above-entitled matter be, and the same is, dismissed without prejudice and without costs to either party. BY THE COURT Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice