Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Perkins v. State, 559 N.W.2d 678.

222 citing documents.

Joseph Jermaine Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Generally, the “scope of review is limited to the question of whether sufficient evidence exists to support the postconviction court’s findings.”
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Alfaro Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Alfaro Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Generally, departures are limited to “double the presumptive sentence length.”
State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. Fordyce Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Green Isiah Kelly, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. Fordyce Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Green Isiah Kelly, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“A criminal defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once entered.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“A criminal defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once entered.”
Jeffrey Charles Morris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeffrey Charles Morris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Generally, the “scope of review is limited to the question of whether sufficient evidence exists to support the postconviction court’s findings.”
Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2014
Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2014
see generally Minn. R. Crim.
Robert Earl Pittman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Earl Pittman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 678, 687 (Minn. 1997) (“If .
Uselman v. State 831 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Uselman v. State 831 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
An intelligent plea is one made “knowingly and understanding^.”
Campos v. State 816 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 2012
Campos v. State 816 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 2012
1 (noting that a plea may be withdrawn, even after sentencing, if “withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice”); (“Manifest injustice occurs if a guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent, and thus the plea may be withdrawn.”).
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
A defendant can establish manifest injustice by showing that the plea was “not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State v. Batchelor 786 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Batchelor 786 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
An intelligent plea is one that is “knowingly and understandingly made.”
Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Raleigh 778 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2010
State v. Raleigh 778 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2010
Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Riehm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 745 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Riehm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 745 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“The authority to make local rules is both statutorily derived and recognized in case law as a practical necessity in performing the judicial function.” see also Minn.Stat.
State v. Theis 742 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2007
State v. Theis 742 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2007
(“The involuntariness of a guilty plea constitutes such a manifest injustice as to entitle a defendant to withdraw his plea.” (internal quotation omitted)); (“Manifest injustice occurs if a guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent, and thus the plea may be withdrawn.”).
State v. Thompson 720 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2006
State v. Thompson 720 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2006
(stating that our court has followed a general rule that when aggravating factors justify upward departure "the upper limit will be double the presumptive sentence length”) (quoting Evans, d at 483 ).
Spann v. State 704 N.W.2d 486 Minn. 2005
James v. State 699 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 2005
James v. State 699 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 2005
In State v. Brown, we stated: A valid guilty plea “must be accurate, voluntary and intelligent (ie., knowingly and understanding^ made).”
State v. Rhodes 675 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 2004
State v. Rhodes 675 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 2004
James v. State 674 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
James v. State 674 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
A valid guilty plea “must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and understanding^ made).”
State v. Wukawitz 662 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2003
State v. Wukawitz 662 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2003

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by