Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Perkins v. State, 559 N.W.2d 678.

222 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Alfredo Torrez Minn. 2026
See, (stating that, in the plea-petition context, “[d]istrict court judges are free to adopt local rules of practice that are not in conflict with state rules promulgated by the Minnesota Supreme Court”).
Ricardo Daniel Peralta Gutierrez, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The supreme court rejected a
Steven Robert Anderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Steven Robert Anderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But a defendant may withdraw a guilty plea “after sentencing upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the [district] court that withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (quotations omitted); see also Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A [m]anifest injustice occurs if a guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“M anifest injustice occurs when a guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, or intelligent.” Perkins v. State
Andrew Charles Patton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Germaine Yurii Butler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A defendant may withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the [postconviction] court that withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (citing Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Jagger Crawford Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Jagger Crawford Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding, despite defendant’s contrary 19 assertions, that the record established that when defendant pleaded guilty, he understood the maximum sentence that could be imposed, based in part on his signature on a petition to plead guilty, which c
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Deontranelle Leslie Davis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Maurice Culpepper, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Perkins v. State , Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
.” (d 678, 688 (Minn. 1997)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Todd Deon Rolack, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 678, 690 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Jamia Lee Griffith, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A criminal defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea once entered.” Perkins v. State
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Mitchell Le Dac Ho, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Douglas Edwin Minor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A19-1330 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
Minn. 2020
The criminal-sexual-conduct cases in which we have upheld greater- than-double durational departures are significantly different than this count.4 Notably, they 4 – 92 (Minn. 1997) (affirming a greater- than-double durational departure for first-degree criminal sexual conduct when the defendant threatened to kill the victim’s children, inflicted “gratuitous acts of violence” on her, and knew that he had AIDS when he committed the offense); Rairdon, d at 327 (fin
Felix Kasper Piah, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
14 To meet the manifest-injustice standard, the defendant must show that the plea was “not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Manifest injustice occurs if a guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent, and thus the plea may be withdrawn.” Perkins v. State
Erick Lamont Lindsey, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Deon Lashawn Mallett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” Perkins v. State
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
To be valid, a guilty plea must be “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” Perkins v. State
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A defendant can establish manifest injustice by showing that the plea was ‘not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.’” Lopez, d at 382 (quoting Perkins v. State , ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 678, 688 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018