Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Perkins v. State, 559 N.W.2d 678.
- Bolinger v. State 647 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Bolinger v. State
647 N.W.2d 16
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
“Manifest injustice occurs if a guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
- Kaiser v. State 641 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2002
- Kaiser v. State 641 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2002
- State v. Kujak 639 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State v. Kujak 639 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Kaiser v. State 621 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Kaiser v. State 621 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Jumping Eagle 620 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 2000
-
State v. Jumping Eagle
620 N.W.2d 42
Minn. 2000
(noting that petition provided that agreement on length of sentence was for recommendation only and defendant could not withdraw plea if court chose not to follow that recommendation).
- State v. Brown 606 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 2000
-
State v. Brown
606 N.W.2d 670
Minn. 2000
A valid guilty plea “must be accurate, voluntary and intelligent (ie., knowingly and understandingly made).”
- State v. Jumping Eagle 602 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Jumping Eagle 602 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Spain 590 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Spain
590 N.W.2d 85
Minn. 1999
(quoting Notion, d at 147 ).
- Alanis v. State 583 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1998
- Alanis v. State 583 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1998
- Sykes v. State 578 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Sykes v. State
578 N.W.2d 807
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
For a guilty plea to be valid, “it must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and understanding made).”
- Berkow v. State 573 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Berkow v. State
573 N.W.2d 91
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(stating that manifest injustice occurs if guilty plea is not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent).