DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bunde, 556 N.W.2d 917.

34 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Raymond Joseph Bellcourt, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    this court considered two consolidated cases.
  • A19-0239 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    Instead, “[t]he [district] court’s determination of the ultimate best -interests issue will be affirmed unless it constitutes an abuse of the [district] court’s discretion or the [district] court rationale suggests an erroneous application of law.” 6 Moreover, i n Kropp, for the principle that the application of statutory criteria to facts found is reviewed de novo.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    for the proposition that Minn. S tat.
  • State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    ting State v. Richardson , (finding reasonable suspicion when vehicle crossed fog line and there was an anonymous tip); 109 (Minn. 1983) (holding objective basis for stop when vehicle did not display license plate, had object hanging from rearview mirror, and made wide turn and crossed centerline); State v. 6 Bunde, ( finding reasonable suspicion when vehicle turned without signaling and crossed centerline); Shull v. Comm’r of Pub.
  • In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • In re the Civil Commitment of Kropp 895 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    24, 2010) (dismissing for lack of timely service of petition on respondent’s counsel); (stating this court reviews de novo the application of statutory criteria to the facts found when considering a challenge to an arrest).
  • State of Minnesota v. Jessica Corinne Anich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Jessica Corinne Anich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State v. Ahmed 791 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Ahmed 791 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Wenz 779 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Wenz 779 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Sopko 770 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Sopko 770 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    “A district court’s application of statutory criteria to the facts found is a question of law that we review de novo.”
  • State v. Lopez 764 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Lopez 764 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    O’ (holding the district court’s application of statutory criteria to facts as found is a question of law subject to de novo review).
  • In Re the Welfare of S.H.H. 741 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • In Re the Welfare of S.H.H. 741 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    O’ (stating that the application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law); (recognizing that the application of statutory criteria to facts as found by the district court is subject to de novo review).
  • State v. Dominguez 663 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Dominguez 663 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Meyer 646 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Meyer 646 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Meyer 641 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Meyer 641 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    on which the district court here relied as controlling authority, involved consolidated appeals by the state of the dismissal of charges against two defendants accused of unrelated violations that occurred outside the arresting officer’s territorial jurisdiction.
  • State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Wagner 637 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    See, (finding reasonable suspicion when vehicle crossed fog line and there was anonymous tip); 109 (Minn.1983) (holding objective basis for stop when vehicle did not display license plate, had object hanging from rearview mirror, and made wide turn and crossed center line); (finding reasonable suspicion when vehicle turned without signaling and crossed center line); Shull v. Comm’r of Pub.
  • State v. Ortiz 626 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Ortiz 626 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    (reviewing legality of arrest outside officer’s jurisdiction).
  • State v. Ambaye 596 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Ambaye 596 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Lorenzen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 594 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Lorenzen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 594 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Patch 594 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Patch 594 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1999