Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hare, 575 N.W.2d 828.

31 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Kenwan Deshawn Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kenwan Deshawn Hunter Minn. Ct. App. 2024
s 11 repeatedly stated that it is error to provide the justifiable-taking-of-life instruction, instead of the general self-defense instruction”); Carridine, d at 143-44 (determining that providing the justifiable-intentional-taking-of-life instruction was an error when the defendant argued that the death was unintended); -33 (Minn. 1998) (determining that the district court improperly gave the justifiable-intentional-taking-of-life instruction when the defendant claimed that the death was accide
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[W]hen instructing on self-defense, courts must use analytic precision.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
And instructions on self-defense should be given with “analytic precision.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[W]hen instructing on self-defense, courts must use analytic precision.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
ourt has repeatedly stated that i t is error to provide the justifiable-taking-of-life instruction, instead of the general self -defense instruction, when the defendant asserts self-defense but claims that the [victim’s] death was not the intended result.” State v. Pollard , , 179 (Minn. App. 2017) ( -44 (Minn. 2012); - 33 (Minn. 1998); State v. Robinson , -3 (Minn. 1995); ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The “defense of dwelling” involves “an unauthorized intrusion into the defendant’s dwelling ,” allowing the defendant to use “reasonable force” upon the intruder without their consent, Minn. Stat. § 609.06, subd.
State v. Schoenrock 899 N.W.2d 462 Minn. 2017
State v. Schoenrock 899 N.W.2d 462 Minn. 2017
State v. Pollard 900 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Pollard 900 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
the district court agreed with the state and ruled that CRIMJIG 7.06 would be provided to the jury, because, “for focusing on death as a result of defense, ...
State of Minnesota v. Adam John Lilienthal 889 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Adam John Lilienthal 889 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 2017
12 “[W]hen the defendant and the victim reside in the same dwelling, the defendant cannot raise the defense of dwelling defense.”
State of Minnesota v. Scott Jeffrey Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scott Jeffrey Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Joseph Devens 852 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Joseph Devens 852 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 2014
We have used the phrase in a defense-of-dwelling case, and have referred to the home as a “castle” while discussing the duty to retreat in a self- defense case
State v. Edwards 717 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2006
State v. Edwards 717 N.W.2d 405 Minn. 2006
But “jury instructions must not materially misstate the law.”
State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
State v. Richardson 633 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Richardson 633 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Glowacki 630 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 2001
State v. Glowacki 630 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 2001
State v. Glowacki 615 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Glowacki 615 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Carothers 594 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1999
State v. Carothers 594 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1999
422, 424 (1907); (citation omitted) (noting that at common law “defense of the home [was] considered equivalent to defense of life itself’).
State v. Ascheman 589 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Ascheman 589 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1999

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by