Henry v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Also decided on this docket: Minn. Ct. App., October 29, 1985 376 N.W.2d 226; Minn., April 12, 1985 365 N.W.2d 770
Cited by
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- A21-0583 State of Minnesota v. Larry Joe Foster, A21-0070, Court of Appeals Nonprecedential, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Stephen Carl Allwine, Minn. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Minn. 2022
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State v. Radke 821 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2012
- State v. Jackson 773 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 2009
- State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
- State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions to expedite consideration of the petition for further review are granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission and Northwestern Bell Telephone Company for further review and Evan J. Henry’s notice of review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same are, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ. App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other motions filed in connection with the petitions be, and the same are, denied.