| a230560r |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2026-02-09 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Lee Hill
|
|
… interview, the district court determined that Hill was competent to waive his Miranda rights. In April 2021, the district court ordered a mental examination of Hill pursuant to rule 20.02 for the purpose of determining his mental …
|
| a221844 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2023-12-26 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Charlene Marie Waldron
|
|
… t officers violated her constitutional rights by failing to provide her with a Miranda warning before questioning her, or alternatively, by causing her to make involuntary statements. The district court denied Waldron’s suppression motio …
|
| A18-0083 |
Minn. |
2019-02-06 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State v. Mouelle
|
|
… es concerning the admission of a defendant's recorded confession under the *714 Miranda rule. 4 Yet in these circumstances we do not doubt the district court judge's ability to set aside her knowledge of prejudicial information and "approac …
|
| A15-1479 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-08-01 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Troy Gary Benjamin
|
|
… ident, arguing that they were taken during a custodial interrogation without a Miranda warning. 2 The district court held a hearing on Benjamin’s motion and heard testimony from Benjamin’s p …
|
| A15-1454 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-07-18 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Travis Richard Otto
|
|
… per Morrell’s squad car. Neither Trooper Morrell nor Officer Finch gave Otto a Miranda warning. While Otto sat in the squad car, Trooper Morrell and Officer Finch searched Otto’s car. At one point, Otto asked Trooper Morrell to ca …
|
| A15-23 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2015-10-19 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Duane Thomas Mizner
|
|
… n came to the spa and wellness center, asked for a statement, and read him his Miranda rights. Mizner testified that he provided a statement and did not call an attorney. On cross-examination, the following exchange occurred between the …
|
| A13-2312 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2015-02-23 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Justin Thadeus Amick
|
|
… e giving the statement. The district court found that Amick was advised of his Miranda rights, understood them, and knowingly and intelligently waived his rights, implicitly concluding that Amick failed to invoke his right to counsel bef …
|
| A14-125 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2015-01-05 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Justin Christopher Mitchell
|
|
… ’s permission, but they did not find a gun. Officer Greenwald gave appellant a Miranda warning before interviewing him at the jail. Appellant admitted that he spoke to N.A. and F.J. at the daycare, but denied that he verbally threatened t …
|
| A13-1373 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2014-07-21 |
Affirmed in part and reversed in part
|
State of Minnesota v. Corey Lee Melde
|
|
… fficer that appellant exercised his right to remain silent after being given a Miranda warning. Because appellant did not object, our analysis is under the plain-error standard. See Minn. R. Crim. P. 31.02. An error is plain if it “contra …
|
| A04-279 |
Minn. |
2005-05-12 |
Affirmed in part
|
State v. Martin
|
|
… the police, given while, she was under investigation and after she was given a Miranda warning, was admitted into evidence at trial under the hearsay exception for statements against penal interest. Id. at- 38, 40, 124 S.Ct. 1354 , The def …
|
| C4-00-2189 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2001-09-11 |
Affirmed in part and reversed in part
|
In Re the Welfare of R.J.E.
|
|
… t that was taken from him by a police officer at his school in violation of his Miranda rights, and that without the statement, there is insufficient evidence to support a finding that he committed the offense. The matter was tried on stipu …
|
| 45529, 45530 and 45531 |
Minn. |
1975-06-06 |
Affirmed in part and reversed in part
|
State v. Beach
|
|
… ller and Beach. At the meeting of March 25, 1974, Schmidt had given Fuller the “Miranda” warnings. In fact, Fuller executed a form at that time acknowledging his understanding of his rights. On March 28, Schmidt contacted defendant Beach an …
|