| 46077 |
Minn. |
1978-07-21 |
Denied
|
State v. Reilly
|
|
… After informing defendant why he was being questioned and giving him a complete Miranda warning, 1 the police asked defendant to recount his activities on the weekend of October 5. Defendant acknowledged that he was aware of his rights and …
|
| 47158 |
Minn. |
1978-07-21 |
Reversed
|
State v. Hoven
|
|
… e was under arrest for the two traffic offenses, handcuffed him, and gave him a Miranda warning. A search of his clothing revealed a hypodermic syringe in his shirt pocket. The arresting officer then requested and was given consent by defen …
|
| 46813 |
Minn. |
1978-07-21 |
Denied
|
State v. Caulfield
|
|
… e checkbook before, whereupon all three persons were placed under arrest, given Miranda warnings, and placed in the squad car. Defendant, who was standing outside the store, *353 was also arrested and given the Miranda warning when he start …
|
| 48684 |
Minn. |
1978-07-14 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Linder
|
|
… appeal is whether the court erred in determining that defendant’s waiver of his Miranda rights was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. We affirm the suppression order and remand for trial. In Miranda the court stated that when the gove …
|
| 47124 |
Minn. |
1978-07-07 |
Reversed
|
State v. Gilbert
|
|
… estigator for the Anoka County Major Crime Investigation Unit (MCIU). After his Miranda rights were read to him, defendant said he had an attorney and did not want to talk to Cuiten without his attorney being present. Cuiten did not questio …
|
| 47909 |
Minn. |
1978-06-16 |
Reversed
|
State v. Bale
|
|
… the misdemeanor arrest and the time of the alleged assault on the ground of no Miranda warning and because it found the misdemeanor arrest to be illegal. We do not address the validity of that part of the order, since defendant has not bee …
|
| 48305 |
Minn. |
1978-06-02 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Brazil
|
|
… taken to the city’s public safety building. Brazil and Kempson were then given Miranda warnings and both said they understood their rights. Brazil was searched more thoroughly and Officer Poole found three tinfoil packets containing a brow …
|
| 47713 |
Minn. |
1978-05-26 |
Denied
|
State v. Carlson
|
|
… ed under arrest. After his arrival at the sheriff’s office, Carlson was given a Miranda warning. He waived his rights and voluntarily talked to the police, maintaining his story that the stain on his jacket was caused by ketchup. A test was …
|
| 48256 |
Minn. |
1978-05-05 |
Denied
|
State v. Willadson
|
|
… efendant made to the arresting officer shortly after being arrested and given a Miranda warning. The issue raised by the state on appeal is whether the district court erred in concluding that the state had failed to meet its burden of provi …
|
| 47712 |
Minn. |
1978-04-07 |
Remanded
|
State v. Weekes
|
|
… nitial investigation and questioned defendant at the Litchfield police station. Miranda warnings were read to defendant at this time. Defendant waived his constitutional rights and denied any knowledge of what might have happened to Michael …
|
| 45948 |
Minn. |
1978-02-03 |
Denied
|
State v. Billups
|
|
… s arrest and again 4 days later in the hospital. Each time, after being given a Miranda warning, he denied any misconduct with respect to that incident. On January 13,1975, defendant’s attorney visited him at the hospital and instructed def …
|
| 47030 |
Minn. |
1977-10-21 |
Denied
|
State v. Ruud
|
|
… tates, 425 U.S. 341, 344 , 96 S.Ct. 1612, 1616 , 48 L.Ed.2d 1, 6 (1976). Hence, Miranda warnings were not necessary and the affidavit was properly admitted. Royce Ruud argues that the admission of payroll checks signed by him was prejudicia …
|
| 46159 |
Minn. |
1977-10-14 |
Remanded
|
State v. Gilbert
|
|
… ain blood and saliva samples, taken from the defendant after arrest and after a Miranda warning, were admissible in evidence in the forthcoming trial. On February 24 and 25, 1975, a jury trial was held on the aggravated rape and aggravated …
|
| 46146 |
Minn. |
1977-10-07 |
Remanded
|
State v. Olsen
|
|
… .Dist.Ct.App.1968) (“[I]t would be sound practice for the trial judge to give a Miranda -like warning about the possibility that inconsistent defenses, evidence or trial tactics might prejudice defendants jointly represented * * *.”). But s …
|
| 46426 |
Minn. |
1977-10-07 |
Denied
|
State v. Widell
|
|
… questions relating to name and address or similar matters must be preceded by a Miranda warning. In State v. Smith, 295 Minn. 65, 69 , 203 N.W.2d 348, 351 (1972), this court, without deciding the issue, stated that “booking questions have v …
|
| 46545 |
Minn. |
1977-09-23 |
Granted
|
State v. Taylor
|
|
… to making his statements to the police, Taylor was informed of and afforded his Miranda rights. 3 . See, e. g., Johnson v. Commonwealth, 477 S.W.2d 159 (Ky.1972); State v. Maggitt, 517 S.W.2d 105 (Mo.1974); State v. Kimbrough, 173 Neb. 873 …
|
| 46459 |
Minn. |
1977-08-05 |
Denied
|
State v. Nelson
|
|
… Criminal Apprehension on December 9, 1974. After being properly advised of his Miranda rights, defendant was asked if he would agree to answer some questions. Defendant replied, “It all depends.” Such a reply by the defendant indicates he …
|
| 46639 |
Minn. |
1977-07-08 |
Reversed
|
State v. Paige
|
|
… h him at R. C.’s, and Paige answered, “Yeah.” Karbowski at no time gave Paige a Miranda warning. The officer testified as follows: “Well, I asked him if he did, in fact, have a gun, and he said, ‘Yes.’ And I said, ‘Would you tell me where i …
|
| 45955 |
Minn. |
1977-07-01 |
Denied
|
State v. Johnson
|
|
… way violated, and the record establishes that he was adequately advised of his Miranda rights. Apart from the taped statement given in Chicago, in which defendant did not directly admit complicity in Bonnie Bye’s murder, the state properly …
|
| 47022 |
Minn. |
1977-05-20 |
Denied
|
In Re Welfare of Larson
|
|
… atters. The confession in this case was admittedly obtained in violation of the Miranda rule but the trial court, applying the Harris rule, permitted the use of the confession for impeachment purposes after appellant took the stand and deni …
|
| 46288 |
Minn. |
1977-05-06 |
Denied
|
State v. Vance
|
|
… defendant was interviewed by police Lieutenant Dale Dow-son. After receiving a Miranda warning, defendant admitted that he gave complainant a ride downtown but denied making any detour or engaging in any sexual conduct. At the conclusion o …
|
| 46415 |
Minn. |
1977-04-15 |
Dismissed
|
State v. Ousley
|
|
… ntention is based on the fact that the investigating officer did not give her a Miranda warning when he questioned her at home on the day of the drowning. She contends that as a result, of this her first statement was inadmissible and that …
|
| 47121 |
Minn. |
1977-03-25 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Fossen
|
|
… cene as he was seated in a squad car outside the house. Without administering a Miranda warning, 1 they separately questioned defendant about his knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the shootings. Both investigators testified that th …
|
| 46023 |
Minn. |
1977-01-21 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Weekes
|
|
… or confined, whether warnings required by the Fifth Amendment and prescribed by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , *3 16 L. ed. 2d 694 (1966), constitute a per se attenuation of the taint of such illegal arrest and confine …
|
| 45889 |
Minn. |
1977-01-07 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Schenk
|
|
… ponse to any question by police and would have been admissible whether or not a Miranda warning had ever been given, 1 Jankord v. State, supra. This incriminating statement, along with other evidence of defendant’s guilt, including the vict …
|
| 45862 |
Minn. |
1976-11-05 |
Denied
|
Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public Safety
|
|
… the squad car. Although the officer testified that he did not give appellant a Miranda warning, 2 appellant told the officer he wanted to consult an attorney. Appellant testified, “I just told him I wanted to see my attorney pronto.” The o …
|
| 45702 |
Minn. |
1976-10-08 |
Affirmed
|
State, Department of Public Safety v. Early
|
|
… g in that condition contrary to Minn. St. 169.121. The officer gave appellant a Miranda warning and asked him whether he would consent to a blood or breath test. Appellant replied that he wanted to talk with his attorney before making that …
|
| 45596 |
Minn. |
1976-10-01 |
Denied
|
State v. Carl
|
|
… violations of his Fifth Amendment rights by impermissible interrogation after a Miranda warning, violation of his Fourth Amendment rights by unreasonable search of the trunk of his automobile, and prejudicial reception of prosecution testim …
|
| 46484 |
Minn. |
1976-07-23 |
Reversed
|
State v. Hobson
|
|
… len property and subsequently charged with unlawful possession of a handgun. No Miranda warning was given defendant prior to his arrest. The single issue raised on this appeal is whether defendant’s oral statements made prior to an arrest t …
|
| 45204 |
Minn. |
1976-04-09 |
Denied
|
State v. Diamond
|
|
… oluntarily surrendered to the Minneapolis Police. The police advised her of her Miranda rights, examined her alleged injuries, and took her statement. Her injuries consisted of a torn fingernail on her left hand, small lumps on the right si …
|
| No. 45651 |
Minn. |
1976-01-23 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Thompson
|
|
… ten exculpatory statement signed by defendant violated the rules established in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. 2d 694, 10 A. L. R. 2d 974 (1966). After careful consideration, we affirm. 1. Although the lineup …
|
| 42778 |
Minn. |
1975-10-31 |
Denied
|
State v. Walker
|
|
… he was interrogated at the city jail for 5 to 10 minutes. After being read his Miranda rights and stating he understood them, defendant agreed to speak to the officers, answering several preliminary questions. Near the end of the interview …
|
| 44815 |
Minn. |
1975-09-12 |
Stayed
|
State v. Crea
|
|
… driver, Dennis McGaughey, who is defendant’s half brother. After being given a Miranda warning, McGaughey refused to speak to the officers. Other officers soon arrived, some to take custody of McGaughey, others to assist in checking the gr …
|
| 44585 |
Minn. |
1975-09-05 |
Denied
|
State v. Van Alstine
|
|
… a hearing had been held, the statements would have been held inadmissible under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. 2d 694 (1966). We do not agree. The rule in Miranda is designed to afford an individual who is ‘s …
|
| 45224 |
Minn. |
1975-08-22 |
Reversed
|
State v. Raymond
|
|
… ive results. During the questioning, prior to which defendant was not given any Miranda warnings, defendant was asked by the chief of police about his conversations with Slager on the day of the shooting and whether he knew Brad Teubner. He …
|
| 44868 |
Minn. |
1975-07-11 |
Denied
|
State v. Bitterman
|
|
… ly contained *484 a narcotic, the officer arrested the defendant and gave him a Miranda warning. A chemical analysis revealed that the substance was heroin. The issue is a simple one: Was this search of the defendant and the seizure of the …
|
| 45474 |
Minn. |
1975-07-11 |
Reversed and remanded
|
State v. Severtson
|
|
… is room, but before they had discovered anything, one officer, without giving a Miranda warning, asked defendant Ricky Severtson, who was standing in the room, whether the room was his or if he was re *489 siding at the farmhouse. Defendant …
|
| 45306 |
Minn. |
1975-06-27 |
Denied
|
State, Village of New Hope v. Eric Duplessie
|
|
… l, were placed under arrest, taken to the New Hope Police Department, given the Miranda warning, and then were interrogated en masse by Officer Oberreuter. 2 Over strong and repeated objection of defendant’s counsel, Officer Oberreuter was …
|
| 45529, 45530 and 45531 |
Minn. |
1975-06-06 |
Affirmed in part and reversed in part
|
State v. Beach
|
|
… ller and Beach. At the meeting of March 25, 1974, Schmidt had given Fuller the “Miranda” warnings. In fact, Fuller executed a form at that time acknowledging his understanding of his rights. On March 28, Schmidt contacted defendant Beach an …
|
| 43549 |
Minn. |
1975-05-09 |
Denied
|
State v. Grilli
|
|
… S. 643 , 81 S. Ct. 1684 , *95 6 L. ed. 2d 1081 (1961), and illegal confessions, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. 2d 694 (1966). In addition to the question of what legally constitutes entrapment, we now address …
|
| 44948 |
Minn. |
1975-05-09 |
Denied
|
Garritson v. State
|
|
… United States ex rel. Vitiello v. Flood, 374 F. 2d 554 (2 Cir. 1967), stated: “Miranda and similar cases forbid the use of unlawfully obtained confessions and admissions as evidence against an accused at a trial where there is at stake the …
|
| 44838 |
Minn. |
1975-03-28 |
Affirmed
|
State, Department of Public Safety v. Stavaas
|
|
… ant was informed that he was under arrest for driving while intoxicated and the Miranda warning was read to him. Defendant, in response to a question of the officer, indicated that he understood his constitutional rights. Immediately therea …
|
| 44469 |
Minn. |
1974-11-08 |
Denied
|
Lundeen v. Renteria
|
|
… ed on the *144 squad car’s radio, at which time defendant proceeded to read the Miranda warnings to plaintiff. After he was frisked and the trunk of his car searched, plaintiff was taken to the St. Paul police station where he was photograp …
|
| 44260 |
Minn. |
1974-06-28 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Winston
|
|
… ice station where they were informed they were being held for burglary charges. Miranda warnings were given. Sheriff’s deputy James Parks testified that defendant Winston gave his address at 4209 Brookdale Drive, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. S …
|
| 44159 |
Minn. |
1974-04-26 |
Denied
|
State v. Dakota
|
|
… rred in not ruling that certain statements made by him before he had been given Miranda warnings tainted and rendered inadmissible other statements made after he had waived his Miranda rights, and (2) that there *13 was prejudicial error in …
|
| 44085 |
Minn. |
1974-04-19 |
Denied
|
State v. Kluck
|
|
… onnection with another charge. Two days later, after informing defendant of his Miranda rights, Lieutenant Robert C. Collins told defendant he was under investigation for the pharmacy robbery. According to Collins, defendant replied, “Just …
|
| 44365 |
Minn. |
1974-04-12 |
Affirmed
|
State, Department of Public Safety v. Nystrom
|
|
… refused to permit testing because he was under the impression, as a result of a Miranda warning he had been given, that he could refuse to take any test until he consulted an attorney. This court affirmed the district court’s finding that d …
|
| 41988 |
Minn. |
1974-03-29 |
Stayed
|
State v. O'NEILL
|
|
… ed himself, advised defendant he was a suspect in Kuehn’s death, and gave him a Miranda warning. In response, defendant became “very wild and upset.” He stated that the last time he had cooperated with the police he had ended up in jail and …
|
| No. 44124 |
Minn. |
1974-01-18 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Lee
|
|
… ed defendant that he was under arrest for burglary and advised him, pursuant to Miranda, of his constitutional rights. Defendant indicated that he understood these rights and stated that he wanted to talk. This officer testified that defend …
|
| 43333 |
Minn. |
1973-11-09 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Martin
|
|
… d that certain statements of defendant made at the scene of the arrest before a Miranda warning had been given him should not have been admitted; that references during trial to marijuana in connection with defendant were prejudicial; and t …
|