| 43571 |
Minn. |
1973-11-02 |
Modified
|
State v. Loyd
|
|
… s and that defendant was a suspect in that robbery. He then gave him a standard Miranda *444 warning but did not inform defendant of the possibility that he might be prosecuted as an adult. Defendant and his parents acknowledged that they u …
|
| 43032 |
Minn. |
1973-11-02 |
Denied
|
State v. Hogan
|
|
… Whitney, also questioned defendant at about 8:35 a.m. After again being given a Miranda warning, defendant responded that he had already been advised of his rights and re *433 peated his previous story. When defendant was taken from the eme …
|
| 43787 |
Minn. |
1973-09-14 |
Reversed
|
State v. Andrews
|
|
… a prosecution question, that defendant, while in custody and after receiving a Miranda warning, had stated that “he had been read his rights many times before.” This evidence arguably apprised the jury of defendant’s prior arrest record an …
|
| 43432 |
Minn. |
1973-07-13 |
Denied
|
State v. Sharich
|
|
… a hearing had been held, the statements would have been held inadmissible under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. 2d 694 (1966). We do not agree. The rule in Miranda is designed to afford an individual who is “s …
|
| 44200 |
Minn. |
1973-07-06 |
Dismissed
|
State v. Beckman
|
|
… reasoned that defendant’s prearrest admission, which he made before receiving a Miranda warning, and the results of the test were illegally obtained evidence in violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. The state appeals, asserting a …
|
| 43660 |
Minn. |
1973-06-15 |
Denied
|
State v. Watts
|
|
… to the alley where victim Chase was found is 224 feet. Defendant, after proper Miranda warnings, denied he attacked Chase. At trial defendant denied ever having seen Chase prior to the preliminary hearing and testified that the police arre …
|
| 43572 |
Minn. |
1973-06-15 |
Denied
|
State v. Roberts
|
|
… r Richard O’Brien interrogated defendant subsequent to his arrest. After proper Miranda warnings were given defendant, he willingly answered several questions during which he twice denied that he had stabbed Clark. O’Brien testified before …
|
| 43583 |
Minn. |
1973-03-30 |
Denied
|
State v. Wajda
|
|
… though the defendant was in custody at the time and police had not given him a Miranda warning. State v. Gabler, 294 Minn. 457 , 199 N. W. 2d 439 (1972); Jankord v. State, 290 Minn. 168 , 186 N. W. 2d 530 , certiorari denied, 404 U. S. 942 …
|
| 43098 |
Minn. |
1973-03-16 |
Granted
|
State v. Wiley
|
|
… e again arrested defendant, this time for possession of marijuana, and gave him Miranda warnings. On *413 the way downtown to the police station, when asked by an officer where he was the night before, defendant stated he was “out selling r …
|
| No. 43245 |
Minn. |
1973-02-02 |
Denied
|
Van Straaten v. State
|
|
… bedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478 , 84 S. Ct. 1758 , 12 L. ed. 2d 977 (1964), and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. 2d 694 (1966). Because these two decisions are not to be applied retroactively, the trial court p …
|
| 42745 |
Minn. |
1972-12-08 |
Denied
|
State v. Smith
|
|
… nt was arrested at his father’s home, the arresting officer informed him of his Miranda rights and defendant then indicated he did not wish to make a statement or answer questions until he had consulted an attorney. Despite his refusal to w …
|
| 42788 |
Minn. |
1972-07-21 |
Denied
|
State v. Bell
|
|
… s interrogations of defendant testified that defendant had been apprised of his Miranda rights and that they had been explained to him. Similarly, it was stated that the forms which defendant signed had been read and explained to him and th …
|
| 42696, 42827 |
Minn. |
1972-07-07 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Van Wert
|
|
… contends that the statement should not have been admitted because there was no Miranda warning or Rasmussen notice. The absence of these procedures is not error when the statement is made in open court with the prodding of the defense atto …
|
| 42728 |
Minn. |
1972-06-30 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Gabler
|
|
… mitting his guilt which he had made before being given a warning as required by Miranda v. Arizona,. 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. 2d 694, 10 A. L. R. 3d 974 (1966), and reasserts that the state did not comply with Rasmussen. T …
|
| 43260 |
Minn. |
1972-04-14 |
Granted
|
State v. Cvar
|
|
… overy of the bottle, defendant was informed that he was under arrest, given the Miranda warnings, and taken to the police station. Preliminary to trial, defendant moved to suppress the use in evidence of the bottle and its contents on the g …
|
| 42773 |
Minn. |
1972-04-14 |
Denied
|
State v. Jones
|
|
… evidence. It is undisputed that he was, at the outset, properly informed of his Miranda rights. At the Rasmussen hearing, the state inadvertently failed to show that defendant had affirmatively waived his stated rights, but defendant did no …
|
| 43101 |
Minn. |
1972-03-10 |
Denied
|
State v. Cormican
|
|
… ing admissions to the police which were later admitted in evidence at trial. No Miranda warning had been given. Several assignments of error were made by defendant, the most important being that the arrest for the offense, a misdemeanor, wa …
|
| 42329 |
Minn. |
1972-02-18 |
Denied
|
State v. Combs
|
|
… the hospital a detective of the Minneapolis Police Department read defendant a Miranda warning and asked him to answer questions. At first defendant declined, but after hearing the officer advise the attending doctor that blood tests were …
|
| 41956 |
Minn. |
1972-02-04 |
Denied
|
State v. Mytych
|
|
… this gun. Defendant was brought into the St. Paul Police Department and given a Miranda warning. She then answered questions concerning her name, age, and marital status. She expressed concern for her daughter in Chicago, asked to contact a …
|
| 42693 |
Minn. |
1972-02-04 |
Stayed
|
State v. LaBarre
|
|
… The search warrant was presented to Huisman, who admitted he lived there, and a Miranda warning was read to all the parties. A search of the apartment was completed, and an inventory of the articles seized was contemporaneously prepared. 2 …
|
| 43012 |
Minn. |
1972-02-04 |
Affirmed
|
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Lee
|
|
… refusal is that he was confused when the arresting patrolman explained both the Miranda warnings and the rights and responsibilities of the implied-consent law. We affirm. The facts and legal issue of this case are in all material respects …
|
| 41663 |
Minn. |
1972-01-07 |
Denied
|
State v. Hoskins
|
|
… alleged violation of the substantive and procedural safeguards afforded him by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. 2d 694 (1966). He claims that these rights were violated by the admission into evidence of an exc …
|
| 42913 |
Minn. |
1971-12-03 |
Granted
|
State, Department of Highways v. Beckey
|
|
… ocation proceeding has been held to be civil rather than criminal in nature, no Miranda warning embodying the constitutional rights to counsel and to remain silent, applicable to criminal proceedings, is required to be given by the interrog …
|
| 42785 |
Minn. |
1971-11-12 |
Denied
|
State v. Johnson
|
|
… mper in St. James and that he had been in St. James on August 31. An incomplete Miranda warning had been given defendant, and this testimony was ruled inadmissible at the Rasmussen hearing. Defendant contends that, if he had not made the st …
|
| No. 42258 |
Minn. |
1971-06-11 |
Denied
|
Severson v. State
|
|
… (2d) 203 ; State v. Strickland, 27 Wis. (2d) 623, 135 N. W. (2d) 295 ; State v. Miranda, 104 Ariz. 174 , 450 P. (2d) 364 ; Barrett v. United States (8 Cir.) 270 F. (2d) 772. In light of the fact that petitioner was effectively represented b …
|
| 42248 |
Minn. |
1971-05-21 |
Dismissed
|
State v. Morris
|
|
… hey were either made voluntarily before his arrest or after he had been given a Miranda warning and they were not made in response to improper interrogation. Jankord v. State, 290 Minn. 168 , 186 N. W. (2d) 530 , certiorari denied, - U. S. …
|
| 42722 |
Minn. |
1971-04-23 |
Affirmed
|
Jankord v. State
|
|
… the time of his arrest were constitutionally inadmissible under the doctrine of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 694. This appeal is from the order denying his petition. Petitioner’s guilt in the homicide …
|
| 42268 |
Minn. |
1971-02-19 |
Denied
|
Black v. State
|
|
… S. 719 , 86 S. Ct. 1772 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 882, holding that the requirements of “Miranda” and “Escobedo” were not retroactive. 5 Now Minn. St. 609.195. …
|
| 42496 |
Minn. |
1971-02-05 |
Denied
|
State v. Beck
|
|
… permitted to testify, over clearly stated objection, that he gave defendant a “Miranda warning,” which, the witness testified, included advising defendant that he had a right to remain silent and that anything he said might be used against …
|
| No. 41365 |
Minn. |
1970-11-13 |
Denied
|
State v. Ulferts
|
|
… nse. During each of .these interviews, the officers were careful to comply with Miranda requirements, and the record indicates that defendant fully understood his rights prior to the time he gave the confession. Neither is there merit to th …
|
| No. 41483 |
Minn. |
1970-07-31 |
Denied
|
State v. Ahlstrand
|
|
… ed defendant’s motion. The evidence clearly supports the court’s findings that “Miranda” warnings of his constitutional rights were read to defendant before questioning; that he acknowledged that he understood “his rights” and expressed a s …
|
| 41670 |
Minn. |
1970-07-17 |
Denied
|
Coolen v. State
|
|
… Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478 , 84 S. Ct. 1758 , 12 L. ed. (2d) 977, and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 694, the confession given by defendant to the sheriff was not illegally obtained. Thus, the …
|
| 42388 |
Minn. |
1970-07-10 |
Remanded
|
State v. Kinn
|
|
… tion after the officers had allegedly complied with the warning requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 694, 10 A. L. R. (3d) 974. From the record of the hearing on the motion to suppress, it *33 …
|
| 41461 |
Minn. |
1970-04-03 |
Denied
|
State v. Hall
|
|
… nt as the man he saw. Defendant was immediately placed under arrest and given a Miranda warning. At 10 p. m., in the detective room of the South St. Paul police station, Leonard again identified defendant as the intruder. At 10:15 p. m., af …
|
| 40037 |
Minn. |
1970-03-20 |
Reversed
|
State v. Hanson
|
|
… offered in support of the voluntariness of this statement fails to show that a Miranda warning was given before the statement was taken, the formalities required by that decision do not apply with respect to trials conducted before its eff …
|
| 41622 |
Minn. |
1970-03-13 |
Denied
|
State v. Fagerstrom
|
|
… e, United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 , 87 S. Ct. 1926 , 18 L. ed. (2d) 1149; Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 694. *299 However, the right of an indigent to have counsel does not give him the unbridled …
|
| 41804 |
Minn. |
1970-02-27 |
Granted
|
Schultz v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co.
|
|
… Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478 , 84 S. Ct. 1758 , 12 L. ed. (2d) 977; and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 694, have been refused retroactive application for policy reasons. See, Linkletter v. Walker …
|
| 41390 |
Minn. |
1970-01-30 |
Denied
|
State v. LaRose
|
|
… ding his conversation with Erskine on the ground that he was denied a so-called Miranda warning. We find no merit in this contention. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 694, was directed at custodial police …
|
| 41402 |
Minn. |
1969-12-19 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Doust
|
|
… st home, were arrested on July 18 and taken to the city jail. They were given a Miranda warning and booked. *338 The next day at 2 p. m. Fitzsimmons went to Doust’s cell and Doust told him he wanted to make a statement. Doust was taken to a …
|
| 41375 |
Minn. |
1969-12-12 |
Denied
|
State v. Nelson
|
|
… s evidence and of his trial both make clear, as the trial court concluded, that Miranda warnings were given defendant prior to the search of his person, before he was questioned by a Federal agent concerning a possible violation of the Fede …
|
| 41983 |
Minn. |
1969-12-05 |
Affirmed
|
State v. Boykin
|
|
… orner of the kitchen. Defendant was then placed under arrest and advised of his Miranda rights. On appeal defendant has raised a number of objections to his conviction. All are without merit. 1. First, defendant contends that he should have …
|
| 40897 |
Minn. |
1969-11-21 |
Denied
|
State v. West
|
|
… e defendant had been apprehended. Defendant was placed under arrest and given a Miranda card. Thereupon, the arresting officers searched defendant’s automobile. The trunk contained a colored television set and a mall with a shortened handle …
|
| 41381 |
Minn. |
1969-11-07 |
Denied
|
State v. Mitchell
|
|
… under arrest and handcuffed. The complaint was read to him and he was given a “Miranda” warning. O’Meara hq,d received from Miss Moss a description of the house and a diagram of the bedrooms upstairs. He testified at the “Rasmussen” hearin …
|
| 41592 |
Minn. |
1969-10-31 |
Denied
|
State v. Lundstrom
|
|
… dren well and asleep. When he went to the police station defendant was given a “Miranda warning” by Officer Knutson. While defendant was talking to Reverend Reidel, the sheriff arrived and defendant was then transferred to the county jail. …
|
| 41026 |
Minn. |
1969-08-22 |
Denied
|
State Ex Rel. Pittman v. Tahash
|
|
… r, cannot be said with respect to the confession made to the superintendent. No Miranda warnings preceded the interrogation which occurred while defendant was held under solitary confinement. Rather, the superintendent assured defendant tha …
|
| 41231 |
Minn. |
1969-06-27 |
Denied
|
Swanson v. State
|
|
… Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478 , 84 S. Ct. 1758 , 12 L. ed. (2d) 977, and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 694. Those decisions do not have retroactive application; hence, defendant’s claim is withou …
|
| No. 41175 |
Minn. |
1969-05-02 |
Denied
|
State v. King
|
|
… early without merit. Nothing suggests that defendant did not receive the proper Miranda warning at the time of his arrest, which means that he was informed of his right to counsel whether he could afford one or not. Furthermore, defendant c …
|
| 41024 |
Minn. |
1968-12-06 |
Granted
|
State v. Mitchell
|
|
… e before he was notified of his constitutional rights in the maimer required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 694. (3) The indictment by which defendant was charged with the crime of murder in the first …
|
| 41285 |
Minn. |
1968-11-01 |
Dismissed
|
Chapman v. State
|
|
… lea was interposed and accepted the United States Supreme Court has declared in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 694, 10 A. L. R. (3d) 974 (filed June 13, 1966), that, in the absence of waiver, statements …
|
| 40415 |
Minn. |
1968-07-19 |
Granted
|
State v. Beltowski
|
|
… mitted by the trial court inasmuch as warnings consistent with the Escobedo and Miranda rules could be found to have been given. In *32 deed, the requirements of the latter rule did not apply at the time the defendant’s statements were made …
|