Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 13 N.W.2d 461.

188 citing documents.

In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
[and] the burden of showing error rests u pon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. B. B. and K. C. M., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing 924 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing 924 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
471 (Minn. App. 2000) ; see also Waters v. Fiebelkorn , 216 Minn. 489 , , 464-65 (1944) ("[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Thomas A. Ruether, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who reli es upon it.” Waters v. Fiebelkorn , –65 (Minn. 1944).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Matter of: Nezha Boutlane, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” -65 (Minn. 1944); see White v. Minn. Dep’t of Nat .
In re the Custody of: J. K. L. Peter Romero Lockhart, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Waters v. Fiebelkorn , 216 Minn. 489, 495, -65 (1944); see Loth v. Loth , 227 Minn. 387, 392, (quoting Waters in a family-law appeal); (applying Loth in a family-law appeal).
Randall Tague and obo Minor, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Duluth H erald & News Tribune v. Plymouth O ptical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498, (noting lack of a transcript precludes review of factual questions); Waters v. Fiebelkorn , 216 Minn. 489, 495, 464-65 (1944) ( “[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Gregory Olstad, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who re lies upon it” 9 (quoting Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495, -65 (1944)); (applying this aspect of Loth).
Etsegenet Setegn, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
[And] the burd en of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Waters v. Fiebelkorn , 216 Minn. 489, 495, 464-65 (1944).
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it” 6 (quoting Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495, -65 (1944)); (applying this aspect of Loth).
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
1a (2014); Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495, (“[T]he burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”).
The Janice Kaunas Samsing Revocable Trust v. Arthur D. Walsh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The Janice Kaunas Samsing Revocable Trust v. Arthur D. Walsh Minn. Ct. App. 2015
unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice”); see also Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495, (“[E]rror without prejudice is not ground for reversal.”).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.” Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495, -65 (1944); see Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387, 392, 9 (1949) (quoting Waters in a family law appeal); (applying Loth in a family law appeal).
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
[and] the burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”) (quoting Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495, −65 (1944)); (applying Loth).
White v. MINN. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES 567 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
White v. MINN. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES 567 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356 , (quoting Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , ).
Santillan v. Martine 560 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Santillan v. Martine 560 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
61 (requiring that harmless error be ignored); Midway Center, 306 Minn, at 356, d at 78 (quoting Waters v. Fiebelkom, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , and recognizing error without prejudice is not grounds for reversal).
Behm v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc. 555 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Behm v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc. 555 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
2 See Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 536 , (reviewing court limits itself to consideration of issues record shows “were, or had to be, presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it”); see also Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , (“on appeal error is never presumed”).
Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc. 237 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1975
Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc. 237 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1975
Significantly, the sellers have the burden of persuasion described in Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , : “It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc. 135 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1965
Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc. 135 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1965
See, Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489 , 13 N. W. (2d) 461 ; Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483 , 27 N. W. (2d) 648 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 .
Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
As said in Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29, 32 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784, 786 (quoting from Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , 13 N. W. [2d] 461, 464): “It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
State v. Engstrom 32 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1948
Potter v. Potter 27 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1947
Potter v. Potter 27 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1947
Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , 13 N. W. (2d) 461, 464 .
Fewell v. Tappan 27 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1947
Fewell v. Tappan 27 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1947
Cf. Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , 13 N. W. (2d) 461, 465 .