Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Smith v. Haveland, 25 N.W.2d 474.

79 citing documents.

Sela Investments, Ltd LLP v. J.H. Minn. 2026
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
That is, the party must show that it “has sustained or is immediately in danger of sustaining some direct injury.” State ex re l. Smith v. Haveland , (quotation omitted).
A25-1221 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
11 Haveland, “no cause of action is necessary to seek declaratory relief under the [Uniform Declaratory Judgments] Act.” In Haveland, the supreme court explained that “the existence of a genuine conflict in the tangible interests of the opposing litigants” is “[a]mong the essentials necessary to the raising of a j
CVC Investments LLP, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Deborah Jane Clapp, Respondent, vs. Dr. Lisa Sayles-Adams, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. 2025
Deborah Jane Clapp, Respondent, vs. Dr. Lisa Sayles-Adams, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. 2025
(considering taxpayer standing to challenge governmental action).
Craig A. Reichel v. Wendland Utz, LTD Minn. 2024
Craig A. Reichel v. Wendland Utz, LTD Minn. 2024
–77 (Minn. 1946) (explaining that principles of justiciability prevent us from issuing an advisory opinion that articulates “what the law would be upon a hypothetical state of facts”).
Lisa Stone, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“[T]he court has no jurisdiction to render a declaratory judgment in the absence of a justiciable controversy .”).
Minn. 2022
–77 (Minn. 1946) (holding that principles of justiciability prevent us from issuing an advisory opinion that articulates “what the law would be upon a hypothetical state of facts”).
A21-0403 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“ The party who invokes the power [of the court] must be able to show not only that the statute is invalid but that he has sustained or is immediately in danger of sustaining some direct injury as the result of its enforcement.” (emphasis added)); McCaughtry, d at 337-38 (requiring direct an
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al., Petitioners, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Smith v. Haveland , , 477 (Minn. 1946) ); -13 (1953)).
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al., Petitioners, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Smith v. Haveland , , 477 (Minn. 1946) ); -13 (1953)).
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Antwone Ford, Minn. 2019
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, et al., Petitioners, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
and Arens v. Vill age of Rogers , d 508 ( Minn. 1953)).
Jean J. Vogt, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
affected in a prejudicial manner.” (footnote omitted) .
Olson v. State 742 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Olson v. State 742 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Onvoy, Inc. v. Allete, Inc. 736 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2007
Onvoy, Inc. v. Allete, Inc. 736 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 2007
Smith v. Haveland, 228 Minn. 89, 92 , -77 (1946); Seiz , 207 Minn, at 281, 290 N.W.
Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92-93
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 621 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Franck 621 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , Seiz, 207 Minn. at 281 , 290 N.W.
Rupp v. Mayasich 561 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Rupp v. Mayasich 561 N.W.2d 555 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , d *558 474, 477 (1946); Minn.Stat.
Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 549 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 549 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , see also Holiday Acres, d at 448 ; Minneapolis Fed’n of Men Teachers v. Board of Education, 238 Minn. 154, 157
Kennedy v. Carlson 544 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1996
Kennedy v. Carlson 544 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1996
Marriage of Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld 529 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld 529 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , -77 (1946); Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co., 207 Minn. 277, 281 , 290 N.W.
Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce 524 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , , 174 A.L.R.
Graham v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners 515 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Graham v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners 515 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co., 207 Minn. 277, 281 , 290 N.W.
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , quoted in Marzitelli, d at 587-88 .
Pike v. Gunyou 488 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
RS v. State 447 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
RS v. State 447 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , ).
R.S. v. State 447 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
R.S. v. State 447 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , ).
Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services 428 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Deantoni v. City of Bloomington 421 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Deantoni v. City of Bloomington 421 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92
St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Marzitelli 258 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1977
St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Marzitelli 258 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1977
Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89, 92 , , 174 A.L.R.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by