Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hansen v. St. Paul City Railway Co., 43 N.W.2d 260.

45 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Todd Clifford Bowlby Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (stating that judge must be fair to both sides and should refrain from comments that would injure either party to litigation).
State of Minnesota v. Mark Anthony Burciaga Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Chad Edward Danberry Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Anita M. Froderman, n/k/a Sydorowicz v. Jeffrey T. Lais Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A19-1560 Minn. 2021
Criticized State of Minnesota v. Donald Albert Strobel Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co. , (judge “unduly criticize[d] counsel in the presen ce of the jury”).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
In the Matter of: Carole Anne Rosemary Dobson v. Ryan Leon Solee Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , he argues that the district co urt’s questioning and comments demonstrated that the district court improperly took on the role of an advocate.
Otis Rodney Elder, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul City Ry., 231 Minn. 354, 360, ).
Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda 789 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2010
Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda 789 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2010
*893 231 Minn. 354, 360-61
State v. Schlienz 774 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 2009
State v. Schlienz 774 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 2009
State v. Dorsey 701 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 2005
State v. Dorsey 701 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 2005
Greer v. State 673 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2004
Greer v. State 673 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2004
Co., 231 Minn. 354, 361-62
State v. Fedor 628 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Fedor 628 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., 231 Minn. 354, 360 , (granting a new trial where the trial court’s clashes with the defendant’s coun *173 sel occurred in the presence of the jury).
State v. Richards 495 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1992
State v. Richards 495 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1992
Block v. Target Stores, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Block v. Target Stores, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paul City Railway Co., 231 Minn. 354, 360
State v. Magee 413 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Magee 413 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Paul City Railway Co., 231 Minn. 354 , (numerous clashes between court and counsel required a new trial).
Gutsch v. Hyatt Legal Services 403 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gutsch v. Hyatt Legal Services 403 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Paul City Railway Co., 231 Minn. 354, 360
Gum v. Medcalf Orthopaedic Appliance Co. 380 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gum v. Medcalf Orthopaedic Appliance Co. 380 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Paul City Railway Co., 231 Minn. 354, 360 , the supreme court stated that the trial judge “should refrain from remarks which might injure either of the parties to the litigation” and “should not act as counsel for a party by raising objections which the party should make.” The Hansen court granted a new trial because the numero
State v. Pierson 368 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Pierson 368 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Paul Ry., 231 Minn. 354, 361 , Reserve Mining Co. v. Lord, 529 F.2d 181 (8th Cir.1976); State v. Ketterer, 244 Minn. 127
State, on Behalf of Hastings v. Denny 296 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1980
State, on Behalf of Hastings v. Denny 296 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1980
Paul Ry., 231 Minn. 354, 361
Fortier v. Ritter's Hairdressing Studios, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1969
Fortier v. Ritter's Hairdressing Studios, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1969
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 .
State v. Jordan 136 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1965
State v. Jordan 136 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1965
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 , are especially apposite in a criminal case.
Schwartz v. Wenger 124 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
Schwartz v. Wenger 124 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
Co. 231 Minn. 354, 360 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260, 264 .
Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 , involved an entirely different situation.
Lewerenz v. E. W. Wylie Co. 51 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1952
Lewerenz v. E. W. Wylie Co. 51 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1952
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 .
Dahlin v. Kron 45 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1950
Dahlin v. Kron 45 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1950
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 .