Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hansen v. St. Paul City Railway Co., 43 N.W.2d 260.
-
State of Minnesota, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (stating that judge must be fair to both sides and should refrain from comments that would injure either party to litigation).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Anita M. Froderman, n/k/a Sydorowicz, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- A19-1560 Minn. 2021
-
Criticized
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co. , (judge “unduly criticize[d] counsel in the presen ce of the jury”).
- State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
-
In the Matter of: Carole Anne Rosemary Dobson, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , he argues that the district co urt’s questioning and comments demonstrated that the district court improperly took on the role of an advocate.
-
Otis Rodney Elder, Jr., petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul City Ry., 231 Minn. 354, 360, ).
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda 789 N.W.2d 860 Minn. 2010
-
Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda
789 N.W.2d 860
Minn. 2010
*893 231 Minn. 354, 360-61
- State v. Schlienz 774 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 2009
- State v. Schlienz 774 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 2009
- State v. Dorsey 701 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 2005
- State v. Dorsey 701 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 2005
- Greer v. State 673 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2004
-
Greer v. State
673 N.W.2d 151
Minn. 2004
Co., 231 Minn. 354, 361-62
- State v. Fedor 628 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
State v. Fedor
628 N.W.2d 164
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., 231 Minn. 354, 360 , (granting a new trial where the trial court’s clashes with the defendant’s coun *173 sel occurred in the presence of the jury).
- State v. Richards 495 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1992
- State v. Richards 495 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1992
- Block v. Target Stores, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 705 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Block v. Target Stores, Inc.
458 N.W.2d 705
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paul City Railway Co., 231 Minn. 354, 360
- State v. Magee 413 N.W.2d 230 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
State v. Magee
413 N.W.2d 230
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Paul City Railway Co., 231 Minn. 354 , (numerous clashes between court and counsel required a new trial).
- Gutsch v. Hyatt Legal Services 403 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Gutsch v. Hyatt Legal Services
403 N.W.2d 314
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Paul City Railway Co., 231 Minn. 354, 360
- Gum v. Medcalf Orthopaedic Appliance Co. 380 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Gum v. Medcalf Orthopaedic Appliance Co.
380 N.W.2d 916
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Paul City Railway Co., 231 Minn. 354, 360 , the supreme court stated that the trial judge “should refrain from remarks which might injure either of the parties to the litigation” and “should not act as counsel for a party by raising objections which the party should make.” The Hansen court granted a new trial because the numero
- State v. Pierson 368 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Pierson
368 N.W.2d 427
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Paul Ry., 231 Minn. 354, 361 , Reserve Mining Co. v. Lord, 529 F.2d 181 (8th Cir.1976); State v. Ketterer, 244 Minn. 127
- State, on Behalf of Hastings v. Denny 296 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1980
-
State, on Behalf of Hastings v. Denny
296 N.W.2d 378
Minn. 1980
Paul Ry., 231 Minn. 354, 361
- Fortier v. Ritter's Hairdressing Studios, Inc. 164 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1969
-
Fortier v. Ritter's Hairdressing Studios, Inc.
164 N.W.2d 897
Minn. 1969
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 .
- State v. Jordan 136 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1965
-
State v. Jordan
136 N.W.2d 601
Minn. 1965
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 , are especially apposite in a criminal case.
- Schwartz v. Wenger 124 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1963
-
Schwartz v. Wenger
124 N.W.2d 489
Minn. 1963
Co. 231 Minn. 354, 360 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260, 264 .
- Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
-
Colstad v. Levine
67 N.W.2d 648
Minn. 1954
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 , involved an entirely different situation.
- Lewerenz v. E. W. Wylie Co. 51 N.W.2d 834 Minn. 1952
-
Lewerenz v. E. W. Wylie Co.
51 N.W.2d 834
Minn. 1952
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 .
- Dahlin v. Kron 45 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1950
-
Dahlin v. Kron
45 N.W.2d 833
Minn. 1950
Co. 231 Minn. 354 , 43 N. W. (2d) 260 .