Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Dependency of Klugman, 97 N.W.2d 425.

51 citing documents.

A20-1351 Minn. 2021
Further, a child’s testimony may carry considerable weight in a district court’s decision, particularly with respect to preference as to custody, see, (explaining that the testimony of a child of sufficient age on the child’s preference for future custody may be entitled to considerable weight); (giving considerable weight to testimony of child who was “sufficiently mature to ma
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: H. R. B. and T. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“The preference of a child who is of sufficient age to exercise discretion in choosing its custodian is entitled to considerable weight .
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. A. M. and M. A. C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
of the parents is seldom, if ever, a sufficient ground for depriving them of the natural right to the custody of their child or children, to say nothing of the statutory right.” In re Dependency of Klugman
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. D. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113, 120
In Re the Welfare of D.L.R.D. 656 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
see also In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 118, , 428-29 (1959) (stating that “the presumption is that the parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of his child, and the burden is upon him who asserts the contrary to prove it by satisfactory evidence.”).
Rodgers v. Knauff 649 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 2002
The burden of disproving this presumption rests upon those who challenge it.” Durkin, d at 152 -53 (quoting In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , , 428-29 (1959)).
In Re Custody of NAK 649 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 2002
Durkin, d at 152 -53 (quoting In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , , 428-29 (1959)).
Durkin v. Hinich 442 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1989
*153 In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , , 428-29 (1959).
In re Estate of Braa 442 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See In Re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 120, , 429-30 (1959); Anderson, 235 Minn. at 200 , d at 284 .
In Re Welfare of M.J.L. 407 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Welfare of M.J.L. 407 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(citing In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113, 118 , -29 (1959)).
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 120, , 430 (1959); State ex rel.
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113, 118 , -29 (1959).
In Re the Welfare of T.M.D. 374 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of T.M.D. 374 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113, 118
In Re the Welfare of L.M.M. 372 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.M.M. 372 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See In Re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113, 118
In Re the Welfare of L.L.N. 372 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of L.L.N. 372 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113
In re the Welfare of L.P.C. 367 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re the Welfare of L.P.C. 367 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
W. at 417 (quoting In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113, 118 , ).
In Re the Welfare of K.P.C. 366 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of K.P.C. 366 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
of the parents is seldom, if ever, a sufficient ground for depriving them of the natural right to the custody of their child or children, to say nothing of the statutory right.” In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113, 120 , (quoted in Welfare of White, d at 80 ).
In Re the Welfare of T.J.J. 366 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 118, , 428-29 (1959); Minn.Stat.
Matter of Welfare of White 363 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of White 363 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113, 120 , (emphasis supplied).
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 356 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of P.J.K. 356 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 118, 124, , 428, 429, 432 (1959).
In Re the Welfare of B.C. 356 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of B.C. 356 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113
In Re the Welfare of M.M.B. 350 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113
Matter of Welfare of Chosa 290 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Chosa 290 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1980
The burden of proof is upon the petitioner and is subject to the presumption that a natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of a child, In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113
Matter of Welfare of Clausen 289 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Solomon 291 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1980
Therefore, there is a presumption that natural parents should be entrusted with the care of their children, and that they should not be deprived of custody except for “grave and weighty reasons.” In re Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 120, , 430 (1959).
Matter of Welfare of Clausen 289 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1980
In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113
In Re Welfare of A. R. W. 268 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1978
In Re Welfare of A. R. W. 268 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1978
In In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113, 118 , we stated: “ * * * Laws which permit the severance of the tie that binds a parent to a child recognize the sacredness of that tie and extend the hope of reunion.
In Re Welfare of Scott 244 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1976
In Re Welfare of Scott 244 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 1976
In re Dependency of Klug-man, 256 Minn. 113
Curtiss v. Hagen 159 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1968
Curtiss v. Hagen 159 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 1968
In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 97 N. W. (2d) 425 .
In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
888 ; In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , ; In re Adoption of Kure, 197 Minn. 234, 236 , 266 N.W.
State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
Lehman v. Martin, 95 Minn. 121 , ; In re Dependency of Klugman, 256 Minn. 113 , 97 N. W. (2d) 425 ; In re Adoption of Kure, 197 Minn. 234, 236 , ; In re Baby Girl Larson, 252 Minn. 490, 496 , 91 N. W. (2d) 448, 453 ; Eisel v. Eisel, 261 Minn. 1, 5 , 110 N. W. (2d) 881, 884 .
In Re Welfare of Barron 268 Minn. 48 Minn. 1964