Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Truesdale v. Friedman, 127 N.W.2d 277.

37 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The record must be “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.” Truesdale v. Friedman
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the marriage of: Lori Ann Saari v. Mark Steven Saari Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The record must be “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.”
TE Miller Development LLC v. Corey Devante Jones, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
TE Miller Development LLC v. Corey Devante Jones, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[T]he party seeking review has the duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors.”
Natasha Siefker Cook and o/b/o Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The record must be “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.” Truesdale v. Friedman
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The record must be “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.” Truesdale v. Friedman
Michael Nassif, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A19-1654 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The record must be “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.”
Midland Funding LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that a record is adequate if it is “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all 17 matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented”).
Morgan Wright, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1(a); (stating that appellant has the duty to provide the appellate court with a record that is “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented”).
Murphy Dressen Consulting, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The appellant must order the transcripts that are “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.”
Etsegenet Setegn, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Father has a duty to present this court “with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.” Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402, 404
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 29, (“Error cannot be presumed.”); Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402, 404, (“It is elementary that the party seeking review has the duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.”).
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Jason Morgan Worsfold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Jason Morgan Worsfold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The record is adequate if it is “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.” Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402, 404
Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. Bergstrom 845 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 2014
John Ward Gillman Engraved June 20, 1775 Copper Printing Plate v. Heritage Auctions, Inc. 806 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
John Ward Gillman Engraved June 20, 1775 Copper Printing Plate v. Heritage Auctions, Inc. 806 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that an appellate court generally will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court); Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402, 404 , (stating that the record must be “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented”).
GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota 730 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota 730 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
The record must be “sufficient to show the alleged errors and all matters necessary for consideration of the questions presented.” Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402, 404
Cargill, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Co. 642 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cargill, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance Co. 642 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402, 405-06 , (allowing parties to shorten the printed record as much as possible without jeopardizing the arguments advanced on appeal).
Port Authority of St. Paul v. Harstad 531 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Port Authority of St. Paul v. Harstad 531 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402, 404 , (“[T]he party seeking review has the duty to see that the appellate court is presented with a record which is sufficient to show the alleged errors.”).
In Re the Marriage of Opp 516 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Marriage of Opp 516 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
But see Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402, 404 , (party seeking appellate review has duty to see that appellate court is presented with a record which shows all alleged errors and matters necessary for review).
Kielsa v. St. John's Lutheran Hospital Association 177 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1970
Kielsa v. St. John's Lutheran Hospital Association 177 N.W.2d 420 Minn. 1970
Mathews v. Taaffe, 44 Minn. 400 , ; Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402 , 127 N. W. (2d) 277 .
State v. Carlson 161 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1968
State v. Carlson 161 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1968
(3 ed.) § 342; Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402 , 127 N. W. (2d) 277 ; 4 Am.
Noltimier v. Noltimier 157 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1968
Noltimier v. Noltimier 157 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1968
(3 ed.) §§ 342, 345, 349; Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402 , 127 N. W. (2d) 277 ; Minn. St.
Truesdale v. Friedman 132 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1965
Truesdale v. Friedman 132 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1965
Truesdale v. Friedman, 267 Minn. 402 , 127 N. W. (2d) 277 .