Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Zylka v. City of Crystal, 167 N.W.2d 45.

105 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Application of DOB Properties, LLC, for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appeal of James W. Bush and Linda D. Dear, tenants, to a Rent Stabilization Determination at 1391 Hazelwood … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“[T]his court considers whether the record supports an agency’s decision before reversing the decision.”); (considering whether the evidence supported the agency’s decision when findings of fact were not made).
In the Matter of the Application of Jim Goodpaster and Sherry Timmermann Goodpaster for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Denial of a CUP is not reasonable if the evidence establishes “that all of the standards specified by the ordinance as a condition to granting the permit have been met.” (stating that denial of a special-use permit which meets the requirements set by ordinance would be arbitrary); see 6 also (reaffirming that denying a permit with insufficient evidence is arbitrary or capricious).
In re SSTS Soil Dispute Resolution. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Zylka v. City of Crystal
In the Matter of the Application of United States Solar Corporation and USS Water Fowl Solar LLC for … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
of Crystal, (footnote omitted).
In the Matter of the Application of Chris Bolton for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A denial of a CUP is arbitrary if “all of the standards s pecified by the ordinance as a condition to granting the permit have been met.” Zylka v. City of Crystal , d 45, 49 (Minn. 1969).
A Resolution Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Denying S. M. Hentges & … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Zylka v. City of Crystal , 283 Minn. 192, 197
Brian Winczewski, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 195-96, -49 (1969).
In the Matter of the Denial of Rental Dwelling Licenses to Compass Rose Real Estate, LLC, and North … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Denial of Rental Dwelling Licenses to Compass Rose Real Estate, LLC, and North … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Carver, (citing Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 196, ).
Appeal of John Krenik to a Vehicle-abatement order at 1270 Cleveland Avenue. 884 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Appeal of John Krenik to a Vehicle-abatement order at 1270 Cleveland Avenue. 884 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 198, (considering whether the evidence supported the agency’s decision when findings of fact were not made).
RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington 861 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 2015
RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington 861 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 2015
We have long held that a city may deny a conditional use permit application if the proposed use endangers “the public health or safety or the general welfare of the area affected or the community as a whole.” Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 196
Billy Graham Evangelistic Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis 667 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2003
Yang v. County of Carver 660 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Yang v. County of Carver 660 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 196
Thul v. State 657 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Thul v. State 657 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 195 , -49 (Minn.1969).
Schwardt v. County of Watonwan 656 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2003
Schwardt v. County of Watonwan 656 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 2003
See Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 195-96
Picha v. County of McLeod 634 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Picha v. County of McLeod 634 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
A denial of a CUP is arbitrary if it is “established that all of the standards specified by the ordinance as a condition to granting the permit have been met.” Zylka v. Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 196 , (footnote omitted).
Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners 617 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2000
Explained Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of Commissioners 617 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2000
This limitation to previously-considered issues reflects a concern expressed much earlier about “the danger of permitting the [governing body] to deny a special-use permit without contemporaneous findings or reasons and then permit[ting] its members after several months of thought to present reasons perhaps totally unrelated to the actual reasons for denying the permit * Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 199
SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 195 , -49 (1969).
R.A. Putnam & Associates, Inc. v. City of Mendota Heights 510 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
R.A. Putnam & Associates, Inc. v. City of Mendota Heights 510 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 198
Earthburners, Inc. v. County of Carlton 504 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Earthburners, Inc. v. County of Carlton 504 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 198
Uniprop Manufactured Housing, Inc. v. City of Lakeville 474 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Uniprop Manufactured Housing, Inc. v. City of Lakeville 474 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 198
Kehr v. City of Roseville 426 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kehr v. City of Roseville 426 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192
Scott County Lumber Co. v. City of Shakopee 417 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Scott County Lumber Co. v. City of Shakopee 417 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 196
Amoco Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis 395 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Amoco Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis 395 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 195
TPW, INC. v. City of New Hope 388 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
TPW, INC. v. City of New Hope 388 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 195-96 , (citations omitted).
Rockville Township v. Lang 387 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rockville Township v. Lang 387 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 195
Carl Bolander & Sons, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 378 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Carl Bolander & Sons, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 378 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192 , a city denied a special use permit application without giving reasons for the denial, thus allowing the Minnesota Supreme Court to conclude that the city acted arbitrarily.
Northwest Residence, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn Center 352 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Northwest Residence, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn Center 352 N.W.2d 764 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192 , Inland Const. Co. v. City of Bloomington, 292 Minn. 374
Campion v. County of Wright 347 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Campion v. County of Wright 347 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Zylka v. City of Crystal, 283 Minn. 192, 198
Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan 348 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1984