Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 176 N.W.2d 552.

54 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See, (stating that “[w]hen there is an evidentiary hearing, we are not able to review a party’s argument that the other party did not prove its claims if no transcript is ordered”); Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. 7 Plymouth Optical Co., (noting lack of a transcript precludes review of factual questions); -65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that “on appeal error is never presumed.
Messan Adjignon, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Plymouth Optical Co., 3 Adjignon submitted medical records to this court in two confidential addenda.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Craig Seitzer. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Plymouth Optical Co., (noting lack of a transcript precludes review of factual questions); -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Duluth Herald & (noting lack of a transcript precludes review of factual questions).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M. D., C. J. M. and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Plymouth Optical Co., see also Minn. R. Civ.
Snowman Construction, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“When an appellant fails to provide a transcript, this court’s review is limited to whether the [district] court’s conclusions of law are supported by the findings.” see Duluth Herald & News Tri b. v. Plymouth Optical Co. , (stating that without a transcript, “this court is not cognizant of the evidence upon which the [district] court based its findings of fact”).
Rebecca Sue Nash, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
4 “While the lack of a transcript does not automatically require dismissal of an entire appeal, lack of a transcript does limit the scope of appellate review to whether the district court’ s conclusions of law are supported by its findings of fact.” (citing Duluth Herald & ).
In re the Marriage of: Samuel H. Boimah, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical C o., (noting lack of a transcript precludes review of factual questions); -65 (Minn. 1944) (stating that “on appeal error is never presumed.
Wat Lao Sirithammaram, Inc., et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co.
A p p e l l a n t s , Minn. 2020
8 Allina cites no evidence from th ese jurisdictions to support its 6 See, e.g., Duluth Herald & (holding a franchisor vica riously liable to a newspaper company for advertising services provided to a franchisee because the franchisee acted with apparent authority in making the contract); –90 (Minn. 1969) (holding sellers of real estate respons
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Terpstra , (holding that restitution may be based on the evidence at trial); Duluth Herald & (holding that, when an appellant fails to provide a transcript, review is limited to the question of whether the district court’s conclusions of law are supported by its findings of fact).
Al Dressely, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Duluth 4 Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co.
Jill Mungall, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Duluth Herald & (stating that without a transcript, “this court is not cognizant of the evidence upon which the trial court based its findings of fact”).
Randall Tague and obo Minor, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Duluth H erald & News Tribune v. Plymouth O ptical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498, (noting lack of a transcript precludes review of factual questions); Waters v. Fiebelkorn , 216 Minn. 489, 495, 464-65 (1944) ( “[O]n appeal error is never presumed.
Sela Invs. Ltd. LLP v. H.E. 909 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sela Invs. Ltd. LLP v. H.E. 909 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Cf. Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co. , 286 Minn. 495 , 498, , 555 (1970) (refusing to dismiss appeal for failure to obtain a transcript, but limiting review to conclusions of law); In re Marriage of Bender , , 605 (Minn. App. 2003) ("While the lack of a transcript does not automatically require dismissal of an entire appeal, lack of a trans
A17-1179 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Cf. Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498, (refusing to dismiss appeal for failure to obtain a transcript, but limiting review to conclusions of law); (“While the lack of a transcript does not automatically require dismissal of an entire appeal, lack of a trans
In re the Marriage of: Jason John Helms, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498
Andrew Kaeding v. Karl Auleciems, Susanne Auleciems 886 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Andrew Kaeding v. Karl Auleciems, Susanne Auleciems 886 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Duluth 9 Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498, (without a transcript, appellant cannot challenge the district court’s findings of fact).
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Jason Morgan Worsfold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Builders Commonwealth, Inc. v. Jason Morgan Worsfold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When an appellant fails to provide a transcript, appellate review is “limited to whether the trial court’s conclusions of law are supported by the findings.” Mesenbourg, d at 494 (citing Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498, ).
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498 , (noting lack of a transcript preludes review of factual questions); (ruling appellate court cannot review findings of fact where transcript not provided).
Marriage of Bender v. Bender 671 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Marriage of Bender v. Bender 671 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498 , (addressing limited scope of review); Mesenbourg, d at 494 (reviewing issues within limited scope of review despite lack of transcript).
Bormann v. Bormann 644 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Bormann v. Bormann 644 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
1; Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498
American Parkinson Disease Ass'n v. First National Bank of Northfield 584 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
American Parkinson Disease Ass'n v. First National Bank of Northfield 584 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498 , (quoting Restatement (Second) of Agency § 27 (1958)).
Bedow v. Watkins 539 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Bedow v. Watkins 539 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical, 286 Minn. 495, 497
Marriage of Mesenbourg v. Mesenbourg 538 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Mesenbourg v. Mesenbourg 538 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498
American Family Life Insurance Co. v. Noruk 528 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
American Family Life Insurance Co. v. Noruk 528 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498
Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 497
Orman v. Farmer Bros. Co. 396 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Orman v. Farmer Bros. Co. 396 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498
Truck Crane Service Co. v. Barr-Nelson, Inc. 329 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1983
Truck Crane Service Co. v. Barr-Nelson, Inc. 329 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1983
Apparent authority “exists only as to those third persons who learn of the manifestation from words or conduct for which the principal is responsible.” Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 498-99 , (footnote omitted).
Lemmer v. IDS Properties, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1980
Lemmer v. IDS Properties, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1980
v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495, 499
Associated Lithographers v. Stay Wood Products, Inc. 279 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1979
Associated Lithographers v. Stay Wood Products, Inc. 279 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1979
Duluth Herald & News Tribune v. Plymouth Optical Co., 286 Minn. 495 , McGee v. Breezy Point Estates, 288 Minn. 10, 22 , 5 ; Restatement, Agency 2d §§ 8, 27; 3 Am.