Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc., 237 N.W.2d 76.

252 citing documents.

Megan Guetzkow, et al v. Brian John Irgens Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Megan Guetzkow, et al v. Brian John Irgens Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Mark Schwandt v. Park Christian School, Josh Lee, Raymond Kvalvog, American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I., Secura Supreme … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Russell Vander Wiel v. Sharna Ann Wahlgren Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., d 76, 78 (Minn. 1975); (applying Midway in a family-law appeal), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of: Kathryn Marie Larson, on behalf of Minor Child v. Keith Norman Marohn Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., see also Minn. R. Civ.
In re the Marriage of: Catrina M. Rued v. Joseph D. Rued Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and that error prejudiced the appellant); (citing this aspect of Midway).
In re the Marriage of: Lisa Ranelle Appelhof v. Joseph Theodore Appelhof, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass’n , Inc. , ; (applying this aspect of Midway in a family law appeal) , rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. H. and D. H., Commissioner of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., see In re Welfare of Child.
Megan Marie Johnson v. Richard Preston Blackwell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Inc., (requiring appellant to establish both error and resultant prejudice); see also Minn. R. Civ.
In re the Matter of: Kaitlyn Mae Steffenhagen v. Christian Castrillon Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. S., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (stating that, to obtain relief on appeal, an appellant must show both error by the district court and prejudice to the appellant arising from that error); (applying Midway in a TPR appeal), rev. dismissed (Minn. May 3, 2005)
In re the Marriage of: Emily Kay Stilwagon v. Shawn Bradford Stilwagon Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (to prevail on appeal a party must show error and that error caused prejudice); Loth, d at 544 ( stating “the burden is on the party asserting it not only to make error appear, but also that it was prejudicial.”).
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Scott Jovaag v. Melissa Jo Helene Jovaag Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (“[E]rror is 7 not presumed on appeal, and the burden of showing error rests on the party asserting it.”).
Michelle A. Krawczyk v. Gregory Scott Aberle, f/k/a Gregory Scott Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., d 76, 78 (Minn. 1975) (explaining appellate courts do not reverse unless the error harmed the 1 Also, Minn. Stat. § 609.52, subd.
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Gumdel Nygare Gilo v. Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ct r., Inc., ( -65 (Minn. 1944).
In the Matter of: Gohar Yesayan v. Sarkis Mkhsyan Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (stating that, to obtain relief on appeal, an a ppellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from that error); Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never pr esumed.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. C. and C. L. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (quotation omitted); see also Horodensk i v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass’n, (“[T]he burden of showing error rests on the party asserting it.”).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Lee Roberts n/k/a Michelle Lee Freitas v. Todd Mykle Roberts, County of … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., d 76, 78 (Minn. 1975)).
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Knewtson, n/k/a Nicole Marie Campbell v. Adam Christopher Knewtson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., ).
In re the Matter of: Madeline Jane McGill v. Elton James Curtis Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Inc ., (requiring an appellant to establish both error and resultant prejudice).
Debra Sakrison v. City of Gilbert Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , ).
Eric D. Humphreys, et al., Ann Humphreys Sellers v. Janet Humphreys Krasner Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., ).
In re the Marriage of: Matthew James Ulness v. Jill Marie Ulness, n/k/a Jill-Marie Stefano Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. J. K. and J. W. L., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Inc., (stating that an appellant must show both error and prejudice to prevail on appeal).
Lariat Companies, Inc. v. Barbara Wigley, Michael Wigley Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (stating that appellant must show both error and prejudice to prevail on appeal).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: T. T. and T. B., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (stating that, to obtain relief on appeal, an appellant must show both error by the district court and prejudice to the appellant arising from that error); (applying Midway in an appeal of TPR); In re Welfare of D.J.N., 568 N
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. M. M. and K. J. D., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (stating that, to obtain relief on appeal, an appellant must show both error by the district court and prejudice to the appellant arising from that error); (applying Midway in an appeal of a termination-of -parental-rights
In re the Marriage of: Ayano Eto Baylor v. Christopher Gary Baylor Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Guardianship of: Jack Earl Kestner, Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Herman Goldenberg v. Karen Lisa Yashar Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (appellant must show both error and that the error caused prejudice to prevail on appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell v. Christine Melanie Parnell Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , d 76, 78 (1975) (stating that, absent prejudice, error is not ground for reversal).
Loralyn R. Brandt v. LaMettry’s Collision Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (stating that to prevail on appeal, the appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error).
A18-1962 A18-1963 Philip Lee Carlson (A18-1162, A18-1962), Virginia Marie Carlson (A18-1163, A18-1963) v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (“ [E]rror without prejudice is not ground for reversal.” (quotation omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Yusuf Haji-Ismail Ali v. Myrna Wati Ali, County of Scott, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Wilson v. Todd Joseph Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (holding that, on appeal, one who relies upon error has the burden of making it appear affirmatively ).
Renee Dianne Florek v. Randall Lee Vannet Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (quotation omitted); see also Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass’n
Carly Jaye Nelson v. Oscar Ivan Garcia Medina Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (quotation omitted); see also Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass’n , (“[T]he burden of showing error rests on the party asserting it.”).
State of Minnesota v. Bruce John Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Rosemary Gyawu v. St. Therese Home, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc. , (explaining that to prevail, an appellant must show both error and resultant prejudice).
In re the Marriage of: Laura Diane Hermer v. Lawrence James Cisek, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Jesse A. Freking v. Audra Jo Buxengard f/k/a Audra Jo Freking Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (“It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Custody of: K. M. A. Daniel Cory Johnson v. Erica Rose-Lynne Arends Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc., (“[O]n appeal error is never pre sumed.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. J. L., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 2 In support of her argument, mother points to an unpublished decision from this court, In re Welfare of C.L.C., which stated that, “when the district court withholds adjudication after making a CHIPS finding it must either dismiss the matter or adjudicate t
In the Matter of the Risk Level Determination of D. R. C Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , d 76, 78 (Minn. 1975) (“It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Matter of: Nezha Boutlane v. David John Harrison Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Keith Jonathan Hempel, II, Decedent, Tobin Hempel and Joshua D. Krsnak, personal representatives … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
State of Minnesota v. Twin Cities Care Services, Abdulkarim Dahir Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc ., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Neil N. Lapidus, et al v. Lurie LLP Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Center, Inc. , 306 Minn. 352, 356
Bremer Bank, N.A. v. Albert B. Beety Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc. , 306 Minn. 352, 356
In the Matter of Julitta Adu-Gyamfi, R.N., L.P.N., R.N. License No. 184096-8, L.P.N. License No. 58788-2 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that “error without prejudice is not ground for reversal”).