Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc., 237 N.W.2d 76.

249 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., d 76, 78 (Minn. 1975); (applying Midway in a family-law appeal), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of: Kathryn Marie Larson, on behalf of Minor Child, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., see also Minn. R. Civ.
A21-1064 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and that error prejudiced the appellant); (citing this aspect of Midway).
In re the Marriage of: Lisa Ranelle Appelhof, petitioner, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass’n , Inc. , ; (applying this aspect of Midway in a family law appeal) , rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. H. and D. H., Commissioner of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., see In re Welfare of Child.
Megan Marie Johnson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Inc., (requiring appellant to establish both error and resultant prejudice); see also Minn. R. Civ.
In re the Matter of: Kaitlyn Mae Steffenhagen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (stating that, to obtain relief on appeal, an appellant must show both error by the district court and prejudice to the appellant arising from that error); (applying Midway in a TPR appeal), rev. dismissed (Minn. May 3, 2005)
In re the Marriage of: Emily Kay Stilwagon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (to prevail on appeal a party must show error and that error caused prejudice); Loth, d at 544 ( stating “the burden is on the party asserting it not only to make error appear, but also that it was prejudicial.”).
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Scott Jovaag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (“[E]rror is 7 not presumed on appeal, and the burden of showing error rests on the party asserting it.”).
Michelle A. Krawczyk, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., d 76, 78 (Minn. 1975) (explaining appellate courts do not reverse unless the error harmed the 1 Also, Minn. Stat. § 609.52, subd.
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Gumdel Nygare Gilo, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ct r., Inc., ( -65 (Minn. 1944).
In the Matter of: Gohar Yesayan, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (stating that, to obtain relief on appeal, an a ppellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from that error); Waters v. Fiebelkorn , -65 (Minn. 1944) (“[O]n appeal error is never pr esumed.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. C. and C. L. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (quotation omitted); see also Horodensk i v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass’n, (“[T]he burden of showing error rests on the party asserting it.”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., d 76, 78 (Minn. 1975)).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., ).
In re the Matter of: Madeline Jane McGill, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Inc ., (requiring an appellant to establish both error and resultant prejudice).
Debra Sakrison, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , ).
Eric D. Humphreys, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., ).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A20-0501 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Inc., (stating that an appellant must show both error and prejudice to prevail on appeal).
Lariat Companies, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (stating that appellant must show both error and prejudice to prevail on appeal).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: T. T. and T. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (stating that, to obtain relief on appeal, an appellant must show both error by the district court and prejudice to the appellant arising from that error); (applying Midway in an appeal of TPR); In re Welfare of D.J.N., 568 N
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. M. M. and K. J. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (stating that, to obtain relief on appeal, an appellant must show both error by the district court and prejudice to the appellant arising from that error); (applying Midway in an appeal of a termination-of -parental-rights
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A19-1067 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Herman Goldenberg, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (appellant must show both error and that the error caused prejudice to prevail on appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , d 76, 78 (1975) (stating that, absent prejudice, error is not ground for reversal).
Loralyn R. Brandt, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (stating that to prevail on appeal, the appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error).
A18-1163 A18-1962 A18-1963 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (“ [E]rror without prejudice is not ground for reversal.” (quotation omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: Yusuf Haji-Ismail Ali, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (holding that, on appeal, one who relies upon error has the burden of making it appear affirmatively ).
Renee Dianne Florek, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , (quotation omitted); see also Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass’n
Carly Jaye Nelson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (quotation omitted); see also Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass’n , (“[T]he burden of showing error rests on the party asserting it.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Rosemary Gyawu, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc. , (explaining that to prevail, an appellant must show both error and resultant prejudice).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Jesse A. Freking, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., (“It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Custody of: K. M. A. Daniel Cory Johnson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc., (“[O]n appeal error is never pre sumed.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. J. L., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 2 In support of her argument, mother points to an unpublished decision from this court, In re Welfare of C.L.C., which stated that, “when the district court withholds adjudication after making a CHIPS finding it must either dismiss the matter or adjudicate t
In the Matter of the Risk Level Determination of D. R. C. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc. , d 76, 78 (Minn. 1975) (“It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
In re the Matter of: Nezha Boutlane, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Keith Jonathan Hempel, II, Decedent, Tobin Hempel and Joshua D. Krsnak, personal representatives … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc ., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Neil N. Lapidus, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Center, Inc. , 306 Minn. 352, 356
Bremer Bank, N.A., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc. , 306 Minn. 352, 356
In the Matter of Julitta Adu-Gyamfi, R.N., L.P.N., R.N. License No. 184096-8, L.P.N. License No. 58788-2. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that “error without prejudice is not ground for reversal”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. L. H., C. L. M., and J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, ; see In re Welfare of Children of J.B.
Ross Ronald Olsen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, .
In re the Guardianship and Conservatorship of: Helen Vikla, Conservatee. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (emphasis and quotation omitted); see also Minn. R. Civ.