Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Nolting, 254 N.W.2d 340.

38 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Any doubt regarding that conclusion is resolved in accordance with “ the preference to be a ccorded 9 warrants,” Wiley, d at 268 (quotation omitted), so as “not to deter police officers from obtaining warrants,” State v. Nolting , n.7 (Minn. 1977).
State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee Fawcett 884 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee Fawcett 884 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 2016
to secure “an independent assessment of the inferences to be drawn from, the' available evidence,” see State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449, 452 , it is axiomatic that an issuing judge is not -bound by the inferences drawn by the officers.
State of Minnesota v. Dana Jerome Duncombe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dana Jerome Duncombe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449, 456, n.7 (1977).
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Joseph Simonson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Joseph Simonson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
7 Even if it were doubtful that the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed to search for controlled substances in Simonson’s home, “the resolution of doubtful or marginal cases should be largely determined by the preference to be accorded warrants.” Wiley, d at 268 (quotation omitted); see also State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449, 456, n.7 (1977) (“The securing of a warrant may tip the scales in doubtful cases.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 869 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 869 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2015
In State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449, 456 , -45 (1977), we concluded that a search warrant for a package was supported by probable cause despite the fact that the affidavit in support of the warrant contained a material misstatement of fact told by a mail clerk to a police officer.
State v. Rochefort 631 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 2001
State v. Rochefort 631 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 2001
The design of this structure is to require an independent assessment of the inferences to be drawn from the available evidence and thereby to secure the people from unreasonable searches and seizures.” State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449, 452
State v. Wasson 615 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2000
State v. Wasson 615 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2000
a good faith exception 3 to the knock and announce rule, we have stated, in the probable cause context, that where a search is based on the probable cause determination of a magistrate, rather than a police officer, we may “accept evidence of a less ‘judicially competent or persuasive character than would have justified an officer in acting on his own without a warrant * * *.’ ” State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449, 453 , (quoting Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 111 , 84 S.Ct.
State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
State v. Profit 591 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1999
State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449, 452-53
State v. Walker 584 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1998
State v. Walker 584 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1998
State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449 , n. 7 (1977).
State v. Martinez 579 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Martinez 579 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(citing State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449 , 456 n. 7, , 345 n. 7 (1977)).
State v. Soua Thao Yang 352 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Soua Thao Yang 352 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
2317, 2331 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449 , , 345 n. 7 (1977).
State v. Braasch 316 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1982
State v. Braasch 316 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1982
State v. Buchholtz 295 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1980
State v. Buchholtz 295 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1980
Also, as we stated in State v. Nolting, 312 Minn. 449 , the exclusionary rule is directed at police misconduct.
State v. Siegfried 274 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1978
State v. Siegfried 274 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1978
and State v.. Mollberg, 310 Minn. 376
State v. Martinez 270 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1978
State v. Martinez 270 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1978
State v. Hoven 269 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1978
State v. Lien 265 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1978
State v. Lien 265 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1978
Recently, in State v. Nolting, Minn., note 7 (1977), we stated: “The securing of a warrant may tip the scales in doubtful cases.
State v. Boerner 260 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1977
State v. Boerner 260 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1977
The most recent case of this court interpreting these decisions is State v. Nolting, Minn.
State v. Causey 257 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1977
State v. Causey 257 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1977
Recently, however, in State v. Nolting, Minn., we held that an innocent misrepresentation, even though material to the determination of probable cause, was insufficient to invalidate a warrant.