Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Genereux, 272 N.W.2d 33.

31 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    Stated somewhat differently, a proper factual basis exists 6 if “‘the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.’” ().
  • State of Minnesota, Minn. 2022
    “The ‘factual-basis requirement is satisfied if the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.’ ” 7 Rickert v. State , n.3 (Minn. 2011) (quoting State v. Genereux , ).
  • State of Minnesota, Minn. 2022
  • Nicholas Patrick Pankuch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    Stated somewhat differently, a proper factual basis exists if “‘ the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.’” (quoting State v. Genereux , ).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
    “The factual -basis requirement is satisfied if the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.”
  • Malik Jordan Olsen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    Stated somewhat differently, a proper factual basis exists if “‘the record contains a s howing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.’” ().
  • Veterine Nicole McGhee, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    Stated somewhat differently, a proper factual basis exists if “ ‘the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.’” ().
  • Jennifer Natalie Bernard, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    A proper factual basis exists if “‘the 5 record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.’” Nelson, d at 859 ().
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    “The factual-basis requirement is satisfied if the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.” d 33, 34 (Minn. 1978).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    “The factual-basis requirement is satisfied if the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that [the] defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he [pleaded] guilty.”
  • State of Minnesota v. Aaron Bernard Zuckman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • State of Minnesota v. Aaron Bernard Zuckman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    A plea has a sufficient factual basis when “the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.”
  • State of Minnesota v. Morrell Grant Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Morrell Grant Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    “The factual-basis requirement is satisfied if the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a 3 crime as that to which he [pleaded] guilty.”
  • Darek Jon Nelson v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2016
  • Darek Jon Nelson v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2016
    “The 13 factual-basis requirement is satisfied if the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.” d 33, 34 (Minn. 1978).
  • Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2014
  • Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2014
  • Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
  • Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
    We have noted that a proper factual basis may be established by written statements of witnesses, , 34 n. 2 (Minn.1978) (noting that a factual basis may be established by including “written statements of witnesses as exhibits”), and that “[t]he factual-basis requirement is satisfied if the *589 record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is
  • Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
  • Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
    The "factual-basis requirement is satisfied if the record contains a showing that there is credible evidence available which would support a jury verdict that defendant is guilty of at least as great a crime as that to which he pled guilty.”
  • State v. Jeffries 787 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Jeffries 787 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    Id.; (stating that district court should have deferred accepting guilty plea until after PSI).
  • State v. Brown 324 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Brown 324 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1982
    State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , State v. Russell, 306 Minn. 274
  • State v. Melina 295 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Melina 295 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1980
    State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , State v. Russell, 306 Minn. 274
  • Holscher v. State 282 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1979
  • Holscher v. State 282 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1979
    n. 2 (Minn.1978), we stated that “[o]ther important ways of establishing a factual basis would be to include written statements of witnesses as exhibits or to take testimony of certain witnesses.” we held that a trial judge who had presided over a partial trial bef